User:TylerDC/sandbox

Article Evaluation

'''Article: "U.S. national anthem protest" ''' Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? '''Yes everything is related to the article topic but one thing distracted me from the objective. There is a paragraph that discussed the relationship of President Donald Trump responses and the protestors. It feel like it took away from the objectivity and neutrality.''' Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? '''It felt like there was a liberal frame around this article because it cited President Trump's quotes and the protester's response which caused a villain and hero effect. ''' Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? '''No, beside what they stated about President Trump's reactions,everything else is good. ''' Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? '''Yes the links work. Yes it supports the article.''' Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? '''There are a few sources that aren't too reliable. Some of them have a ".co" ''' How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? '''I feel like the way we discuss this topic in class is very politically charged because we all have our own opinions but on Wikipedia, information has to be non-biased. '''