User:TylerMay12/Bench press/Rezwanas Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

TylerMay12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TylerMay12/Bench_press?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bench Press

Evaluate the drafted changes
The statements are relevant to the article topic and aren't distracting. They seem unbiased and neutral. I'd say everything is equally represented. The source works and verifies the information included in the article. However, there can be two more sources added so that there is a variety of references/information, making the statemnts more accurate. Facts are cited but as previously mentioned, more sources should be added. Everything is up to date and doesn't seem to be missing anything. There are grammar mistakes like spelling, repetition, and commas. Other than that, I'd say you did very well including technical information on the specific topic you chose.