User:TylerSukovski/FIFA/Jirwin1011 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? TylerSukovski
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: FIFA

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, the lead has been updated to match the peer's new content
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, the lead introduces the topic and provides the necessary information about what it is
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, the lead guides the reader into the content that will be touched on throughout the article
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, the lead includes extra information that is not later touched on
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise, even though it is quite long, it is not overly detailed

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the content added to the article all relates back to the original topic
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, most of the content if from recent years, a couple bits of information do seem a bit out of date but that could be due to the information online not being up to date
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, all content in the article belongs there, and there is not much more on the topic that I believe could be added

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, all content added to the article is neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There is one point that I could see people thinking is bias, but it is not super evident and in my opinion it is not a heavy bias at all
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, I believe all viewpoints are equally represented throughout the article
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the information added to the article is all neutral and not persuasive at all in my opinion

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all content is backed by reliable sources
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes, majority of the sources are current
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, all links that I checked worked

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the content added to the article is very well-written and worded in a clear way
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not any that I could identify
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, all content is well-organized and is broken down in a clear way

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes, all images have sufficient explanations accompanying them
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes, they all meet the guidelines
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, images are not all placed in one section of the content, they are distributed nicely

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? N/A
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? N/A
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? N/A
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? N/A

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, the content added provides the additional information that the article was lacking originally
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content added improves the overall understanding of what "FIFA" actually is, as most people would mistake if for the very popular video game about soccer that shares the same name
 * How can the content added be improved? Honestly I believe the content of the article has been improved substantially and I personally cannot think of any way to make it any better