User:Tyler Kelso/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

I chose this article because of my likely future in the field of technology and my curiosity of the process, history and future of Digital image processing.
 * Name of article: Digital image processing
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate:

Lead
-The lead for this article is incredibly clear in its intentions and the information it will be representing. -Lead includes the concepts that will be reviewed in the article, but not in as much detail. -All information addressed in the lead is represented in the article. -The lead is very concise in representing the information it presents.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
All content shown in the article is relevant information regarding Digital imaging processing The content this article makes reference to is mostly current articles as late as 2019, but does hold information from the 1990's due to its history section. All content in the article is content that belongs within this article/is appropriate to the article. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance
The article remains 100% neutral and only discusses facts relevant to digital imaging processing. The article does not make claims that appear biased towards and position There are no over-represented or underrepresented viewpoints within the article The article does not attempt to persuade the reader in any one position
 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation The articles tone remains completely unbiased as the article strictly covers facts about digital imaging processing and does not have any over-represented or underrepresented viewpoints or attempt to persuade the reader towards any one position.

Sources and References
All of the information comes from reliable sources. The sources used for this article reflect the available literature on the topic. The sources are all as current as the late 2010's (except for the sources relating to the history section, where the information is accurate about the time they represent). The sources are written by a plethora of different authors the links used in the article as reference work
 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
The article is setup neatly and makes it very easy to understand information. The article does not have any grammatical errors that went noticed. The article is broken down into the various components that have gone into Digital imaging processing
 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
The article uses images to help readers better understand the different transformations available for Digital image processing The images are very clearly captioned so the reader can determine their place and use in the article The images adhere to Wikipedias copyright regulations The images are laid out in a table and are made very easy to understand
 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page
There is the topic of merging the article with the article Digital imaging. This article is a part of the WikiProject: WikiProject Technology which is related to the WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

Overall impressions
Overall I believe the article is a very strong article that represents information very well. The article makes great use at using its references and related articles within itself. The article could be improved by including information on the current day use of Digital image processing or linking to articles regarding that matter. This article is incredibly well developed and has flawlessly executed the basic fundamental rules in creating a well developed article.
 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?