User:Tynenmj9041/Fort McCoy, Wisconsin/Rippaj5583 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Tynenmj9041
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Tynenmj9041/Fort McCoy, Wisconsin

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? the lead seems to be concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Sort of, the most recent source was 2010.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? None that I can notice.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Not yet
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? There are 3 sources added, two come from the same magazine.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, 2010.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Maybe make the POW its own section or a subheading?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? None added
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? No
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Only 3 sources added, two come from the same magazine. I am not sure how much information is out there about this.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes! What you added to the introduction is good. Your paragraph on POW is strong as well.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Citing sources, new ideas.
 * How can the content added be improved? Maybe find an additional source.

Overall evaluation
Well done! What you have added looks really strong. I think finding an additional, primary source would be helpful.