User:TypiclTori/sandbox/Community Development Article V Community Engagement Article

Community Development:

• Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?"• Contents says that Australia is in the global North. No, this article does not have reliable sources.""• Very long quotes"• Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?"• UK is the most talked about. Canada, Australia are short. Not even information."• Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?"• There is a link in the second paragraph that should be a citation at the bottom, not in the text itself.""• Citation number 1 did not work- Page not found.""• Citation 3 was not accurately cited and from the UK not usa.""• Page could not be reached for number 4""• Citation 7 is cited and the link works accurately.""• Lots and lots of missing citations throughout the article."• Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?"• Yes, there is missing information and the information that is there is outdated. There is no citation for strong statements that should need a reference."• Check the "talk" page of the article - what is the Wikipedia community saying about how to present this topic? How is the article rated in terms of Wikipedia's quality scale? "Start-class /High importance."

Community Engagemen t  :

• Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?"• Not every fact is directly referenced."• Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?"• Yes everything in the article is relevant."• Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?"• The article is neutral"• Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?"• This is where I would say the article needs help improving. Only 3 references were cited. Not bias but outdated."• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?"• One of the categories is called 'Current Methods and Implementation'""○ There is only one method explained."• Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?"• This is a bad article because none of the citations are linked."• Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?"• Yes there was several older sources that were missing information."• Check the "talk" page of the article - what is the Wikipedia community saying about how to present this topic? How is the article rated in terms of Wikipedia's quality scale? "• Start Class quality scale. Mid importance."• What sections in this article are different than in the Community Development article? What new information or different information is presented in the two?

Both articles are start class quality with mid importance for the same Community Wiki Project, the two both need help in formatting (grammar, punctuation etc), staying on topic, and accurately citing references."• Comm Development article talks about specific locations (UK, US…) The CD article talks about the history unlike the CE article.""• Community Engagement article is focused on methods"Start-class articles are just one step above stub articles because they are slightly longer in length.