User:TysonM343/Horticulture/Ggill05 Peer Review

LGeneral info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

TysonM343


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:TysonM343/Horticulture
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Horticulture

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I don't see a lead present, so I would advise you to go back and add a lead section, as it tells you the topic of the article without the reader having to go through the entire section, as well as, give a brief description of each major section of the article to kind of summarize what the article is about.

Content: The content is relevant to the topic and up to date, but there is just so much of it all grouped together. Perhaps if it was moved or section into different paragraphs it would be easier to read and understand. Some of the sub-sections have a sentence each, which makes it look a bit out of place compared to the rest of the article.

Tone and Balance: The content add is neutral, and there is no first-person accounts for any of the information provided. When reading through it appears to be fairly balanced article, with no biases or the article leaning more towards one viewpoint.

Sources and References: There is a mix of sources, some appear to be journal articles while others appear to be links to online websites. The sources look fairly recent with some in 2019 and 2016. The journal articles seem to be written by a diverse section of people, all over the world.

Organization: As mentioned before, it does look a bit disorganized, not it terms of the heading and sub-headings, but the amount of information all crammed into one paragraph. It will help if the content is a bit more spread out. As I was reading the article, there were a lot of spelling/grammar errors, so that should be looked over.

Images and Media: There are no images in you sandbox, so I would recommend adding some to allow for a better understanding by connecting the words to visuals.

Overall impressions: Overall, this is a fantastic article, that has good content, tone and balance, the article does seem to be more complete. As I said, the information needs to be more spaced out, some images could be added, and the spelling and grammar needs to be looked at.