User:Tyw7/Admin coaching

Editor statistics

 * Links for Tyw7:
 * Soxred's analysis of Tyw7's edits
 * Edit summary usage for Tyw7 can be found here.
 * Q: this page don't seem to be working!
 * A: it's working now, there was a "/" missing
 * Q: How can I have zero edits??
 * A:

Why do you want to be an admin?
Q: So why do you want to be an admin?

A: Because I look up to the Admins and I would like the tools available to admins to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia.

What do you expect from the admin coaching process?
Q: How can I help you prepare for an RFA?

A: Help me gain the experience needed to become an Admin.

Standard (mandatory) RFA questions
Answer these questions:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?


 * A: Any adminstrative work I am capable to do! Because I am a full time high school student, I cannot dedicate all my time to Wikipedia!

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?


 * A: I have collobrated with TechOutsider on Norton 360 and Norton Internet Security, which are both GA. I have also uploaded the image File:Planetdead2.jpg, which is used in the toolbox.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?


 * A: I have so far not encounter any major conflits or disagreements with other users. I have had one conflict with the screenshot of Norton LiveUpdate. However, I provided another better screenshot and the conflict ended peacefully.

Vandals are particular stress to me. They seem to have ruin and tear down this wonderous encyclopedia. Did you know there is a WikiProject on Vandals in Wikipedia. Checkout Rouge_admin!

Commentary
I think the main reason that so many of your RfA's failed was due to lack of experience. I notice that you have participated in 3 AfD's, but that was it. You should consider participating in more AfD's. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Phase II: Wikipedia experience
Some questions about things that you have done

Editing Experience
Have you ever:


 * Written a DYK?
 * ✅, but article is not valid (not expended five folds)
 * Written a good article?
 * Collobrated on an article
 * Created any featured content?
 * uploaded an image?
 * used automated tools/.js tools such as Twinkle, AWB, or Huggle?
 * joined a Wikipedia project?
 * warned an editor for violating a Wikipedia policy or guideline?
 * joined a Wikipedia project?
 * warned an editor for violating a Wikipedia policy or guideline?
 * warned an editor for violating a Wikipedia policy or guideline?
 * warned an editor for violating a Wikipedia policy or guideline?

Project experience
Have you ever:
 * contributed to an XFD? been involved in an extended discussion on one?
 * What is an XFD?
 * Something like WP:AFD, WP:RFD, WP:TFD, etc.
 * voted in an RFA? been involved in an extended discussion on an RFA?
 * contributed to WT:RFA?
 * requested and received/been denied for Rollback?
 * contributed to WT:RFA?
 * requested and received/been denied for Rollback?
 * requested and received/been denied for Rollback?

Previous RFAs
Q: Have you ever had a previous RFA? A: Yes.


 * Requests for adminship/Tyw7


 * Requests for adminship/Tyw7 2


 * Requests for adminship/Tyw7 3


 * Requests for adminship/Tyw7 4

Dispute resolution
Have you ever:
 * responded to an WP:3O or a content WP:RFC? been involved in an extended discussion on one?
 * opened an WP:RFC for user conduct?
 * requested a page to be protected at WP:RfPP?
 * been named as a party to a request for mediation?
 * participated in a WP:MEDCOM or WP:MEDCAB mediation?
 * ✅--Requested mediation with another user (user vs. user & I acted as mediator). Case solved with third party help.
 * mediated or otherwise acted as a neutral party in a dispute?
 * participated in an extended discussion on WP:AN or WP:ANI?
 * participated in a WP:MEDCOM or WP:MEDCAB mediation?
 * ✅--Requested mediation with another user (user vs. user & I acted as mediator). Case solved with third party help.
 * mediated or otherwise acted as a neutral party in a dispute?
 * participated in an extended discussion on WP:AN or WP:ANI?
 * participated in an extended discussion on WP:AN or WP:ANI?

Conflict and misconduct
Have you ever:
 * been blocked?
 * been named as a party to a request for arbitration?
 * been the subject of an WP:RFC for user conduct?
 * been the subject of an WP:RFC for user conduct?
 * been the subject of an WP:RFC for user conduct?

Other questions
Have you ever:
 * taken a look at meta philosophies? I'm interested in knowing what philosophies you believe you adhere to.
 * I have read it but am not to sure what it all means. On a rough glance, I believe in moderate immediatism?
 * helped out on the Account Creation Toolserver Interface?
 * answered a question at the help desk?
 * --I have asked a question.
 * --I have asked a question.

Phase III: Administrator's reading list
Review the pages in the Administrator's reading list. Put a ✅ next to each document that you have read. Put any questions you have on User talk:Genius101/Admin coaching.

Admins are expected to have an intimate understanding of Wikipedia policy. They are also expected to consistently demonstrate comprehension of these policies. This is especially paramount regarding the use of abilities entrusted to admins which are unavailable to regular users and editors of Wikipedia.

The following items are considered highly recommended reading material. These pages detail prerequisite knowledge required by an admin:

Should already know

 * Five pillars of Wikipedia✅
 * Community foundation issues: Core principles guiding all Wikimedia projects.✅

General

 * Administrators✅
 * Admins' how-to guide✅
 * Admins' noticeboard for general discussion of admin issues
 * Admins' noticeboard where 3RR violations are reported
 * Admins' noticeboard where incidents are reported
 * List of policies
 * New admin school

Security

 * Security✅

Content policies

 * Biographies of living persons✅
 * Neutral point of view✅
 * No original research✅
 * Verifiability✅

Copyright

 * Copyrights✅

Blocking

 * Bans and blocks✅
 * Banning policy
 * Blocking IP addresses✅
 * Blocking policy

Page protection

 * Protection policy ✅

Deletion

 * Criteria for speedy deletion✅
 * Deletion guidelines for administrators
 * Deletion policy
 * Deletion process
 * Undeletion policy

Requests

 * Backlogged processes requiring attention
 * Changes related to Requests for administrator attention✅
 * Enforcement of arbitration rulings

Vandalism

 * Dealing with vandalism✅
 * Vandalbot✅

Controversy

 * List of controversial issues
 * NPOV dispute
 * Wheel war

Miscellaneous

 * Advice for new Administrators
 * Editing the main page
 * Goals of the Adminship process
 * How to fix cut and paste moves
 * Image use policy
 * MediaWiki Administrator's Handbook
 * Office Actions
 * Open Proxies
 * What Adminship is not✅

July 2009
Please respond below. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 18:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I would consider myself as a inclusionist. BTW, does adding the  count as RFD deletion discussion. -- Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 22:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No, hangon is for the speedy deletion process. WP:RFD is redirects for discussion, a completely different process. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 15:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)