User:Tznkai/desk/Reports/Martinphi Jan 12 2009 Ban

Martinphi's last 500 contributions as of 16:40 12 January 2009 UTC

* 06:31, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Neale Donald Walsch ‎ (→Criticism: Sources first)  (top) [rollback] * 06:15, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Why Wikipedia cannot claim the earth is flat) * 03:38, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Exceptional claims: Reply to Scientizzle) * 03:35, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Exceptional claims) * 02:19, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wording is too open for interpretation) * 02:18, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wording is too open for interpretation) * 02:14, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wording is too open for interpretation) * 02:13, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wording is too open for interpretation) * 02:04, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wording is too open for interpretation) * 02:02, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wording is too open for interpretation) * 01:54, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wording is too open for interpretation) * 01:44, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wording is too open for interpretation) * 01:31, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Fringe science vs. pseudoscience) * 01:23, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Tiny example) * 01:13, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wording is too open for interpretation) * 00:03, 12 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Debunking: Correct a minor mistake) * 22:44, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed: The ArbCom is allowing Original Research---at this point they are creating policy) * 22:37, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→On remedy 7 and stoking fires) * 22:32, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Tiny example) * 06:57, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Tiny example) * 06:55, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Tiny example) * 06:51, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Mentorship) * 06:13, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Tiny example) * 06:11, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Cold reading ‎ (Rv -this is a WP:BLP violation, as well as heavy POV) * 06:00, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→On remedy 7 and stoking fires: tiny example of debunking. Little case study, though I could give dozens, worse) * 03:52, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→On remedy 7 and stoking fires) * 03:51, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→On remedy 7 and stoking fires) * 01:50, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→comment to Martinphi) * 01:47, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Comment: If it's going to be a contest, and it is, why not have rules and make it work for the good of the encyclopedia?) * 01:27, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Further: Please note also that you just wrote the last section of the table into this ArbCom) * 01:19, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) m Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Evidence presented by User:DGG) * 01:14, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Advocacy) * 01:07, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Remedy 5) * 01:06, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Further) * 01:04, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!: I think policy is fine the way it is and the last thing I want to do is change it.) * 00:45, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed) * 00:43, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed) * 00:32, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed: My position on policy has been to be a stick-in-the-mud along with a bunch of other editors like Blueboar and Vassyana, and say there is no change necessary) * 00:28, 11 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Comments) * 23:34, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed) * 23:31, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed) * 23:11, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed) * 23:07, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed) * 21:11, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Remedy 5) * 20:20, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Remedy 5) * 20:18, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Remedy 5) * 07:58, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Remedy 5) * 07:47, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Remedy 5) * 07:43, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Remedy 5: Can't be just one person) * 07:32, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Missing the point on SPOV) * 07:26, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Remedy 5) * 07:23, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Remedy 5: Collegiality. To FT2. Try this for a solution) * 06:26, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Missing the point with SPOV: To Kim van der Linde) * 05:35, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Question on process) * 05:07, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Debunker ‎ (Use word "deride" to stand in for "excoriate (a claim, assertion, sentiment, etc.) as being pretentious, false, or exaggerated") * 03:55, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Scientific focus: Question on process.) * 03:13, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→ScienceApologist is a defender of the encyclopedic character of Wikipedia: To Coppertwig) * 03:09, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Scientific Fundamentalism and Pseudoskepticism POV pushing shouldn't be tolerated) * 02:31, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Scientific focus) * 02:30, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Scientific focus) * 01:57, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→SPOV, Pseudoskepticism and exceptional claims) * 00:28, 10 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Scientific Fundamentalism and Pseudoskepticism POV pushing shouldn't be tolerated: To Skinwalker) * 22:26, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Note re: block of User:Feline1) * 22:01, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Note re: block of User:Feline1) * 05:45, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking: Nice statement) * 05:37, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Attacking) (top) [rollback] * 05:33, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Advocacy) * 05:08, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Attacking) * 05:07, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Negative primary definitions) * 05:00, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→General) * 04:48, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→General) * 04:47, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→General) * 04:45, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Negative primary definitions) * 04:45, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Absolute statements) * 04:39, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Absolute statements) * 04:29, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Statements without sources) * 04:27, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Misuse of sources) * 04:10, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Placing extreme requirements) * 04:07, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ * 03:59, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Scientific Fundamentalism and Pseudoskepticism POV pushing shouldn't be tolerated) * 03:52, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Difficulty in effectively retracting threats: forgot to sign last night) * 03:23, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (→Abuse of attribution) * 03:08, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) N User:Martinphi/Debunking ‎ (←Created page with '===Types of debunking=== ====Abuse of attribution==== See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard&oldid=262884151#Wh...') * 03:02, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi ‎ (top) [rollback] * 02:11, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Exceptional claims) * 02:06, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking defined for Wikipedia) * 01:51, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Advocacy: Sorry) * 00:56, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Content Arbcom) * 00:54, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Anti-expert: Then they come and insult everyone who tries to correct them as fringe POV pushers.) * 00:51, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→POV-pushing) * 00:46, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Wikipedia articles should not debunk) * 00:45, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking defined: Another proposal, some adjustments) * 00:28, 9 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Advocacy: diff or forfeit) * 22:33, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Advocacy) * 22:31, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Advocacy) * 21:24, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Advocacy) * 05:02, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ (table) (top) [rollback] * 05:01, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Wikipedia articles should not debunk) * 04:58, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Verifiability, not truth) * 04:55, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Mentorship) * 04:54, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Mentorship: Debunking may be recognized as an active promotion of disbelief or derision in Wikipedia articles. It is the advocacy of a particular bias or point of view) * 04:47, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→SPOV and the Scientific Method: Debunking may be recognized as an active promotion of disbelief or derision in Wikipedia articles.) * 04:33, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→SPOV and the Scientific Method) * 04:19, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→ScienceApologist has repeated violated NPOV) * 04:17, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→ScienceApologist has repeated violated NPOV) * 04:16, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi ‎ (→Links) * 04:11, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→There is a significant minority favorable to cold fusion) * 04:08, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Difficulty in effectively retracting threats: A bit more to the point) * 04:05, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Use of death threats to intimidate) * 04:03, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Enforcement of content policies) * 04:01, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Gray areas) * 03:47, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Edit warring and disruption: actual diff) * 03:42, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Edit warring and disruption) * 03:37, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Edit warring and disruption: ScienceApologist has been the beneficiary of a double standard.) * 02:44, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:NLP and science ‎ (mixed up the articles) (top) [rollback] * 02:43, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:NLP and science ‎ (→NPOV) * 02:29, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard ‎ (→When to ascribe an opinion to a source (from talk page): Since this relates to the current ArbCom....) * 01:51, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Advocacy: Alright, here's my real POV and editing bias) * 00:53, 8 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Supervised Editing) * 22:40, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Supervised Editing) * 22:10, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Advocacy: More evidence?) * 20:30, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Supervised Editing) * 20:11, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Relevant comparisons) * 06:58, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Relevant comparisons) * 06:55, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Supervised Editing) * 06:26, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Relevant comparisons: clearer. How hard to say things clearly) * 06:25, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Relevant comparisons: work- not "trying") * 06:22, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Relevant comparisons: Response to fyslee) * 05:59, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Supervised Editing: maybe) * 05:41, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Time) * 05:26, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Relevant comparisons: Why it has to be win or lose) * 03:43, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) m Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Prominence) * 03:11, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Prominence: Expected you'd say that- I would hope you could change it.) * 02:52, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Prominence) * 02:34, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Prominence) * 02:32, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Prominence) * 02:31, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Prominence: Suggested rewording) * 01:47, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Prominence: copy edit) * 01:40, 7 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Wikipedia is not a crystal ball) * 22:12, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposals by Martinphi) * 22:06, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking) * 22:04, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed findings of fact: Say no to this....) * 20:10, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration ‎ (→Statement by Shoemaker's Holiday (talk)) * 07:07, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!: Heh, seems he's less retired than I am) * 06:56, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→New Energy Times) * 06:55, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→New Energy Times) * 06:54, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→New Energy Times) * 06:43, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Policy decisions by government bodies about for instance the safety of chemicals should not be equalled with a scientific mainstream consensus: I was talking to you as a member, perhaps unfairly) * 06:00, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!) * 05:57, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!) * 05:26, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi ‎ * 05:21, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Civility ‎ (→"Psychologist finds Wikipedians grumpy and closed-minded") * 05:13, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→New Energy Times: Indent, hope you don't mind) * 05:11, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→New Energy Times) * 04:37, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!: Resounding silence.... and the sign said They don't have an answer so they thundered out the sound of silence....) * 04:21, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!: spellcheek) * 03:57, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!) * 03:46, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!) * 03:38, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!: Perhaps a bit of personal testimony of what I can't support by diffs, and probably can't find in email, either ):)   * 03:33, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!: More...)    * 03:08, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!)    * 03:01, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!)    * 02:53, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!: diff etc)    * 02:45, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!: dum de dum dum doooooooooooo more to come)    * 02:25, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Unfinished!) * 02:22, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Debunkery: m-ph, taking this out for now) * 02:20, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Evidence presented by Martinphi) * 02:11, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→ScienceApologist is a defender of the encyclopedic character of Wikipedia) * 02:09, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Regarding the value of civility in the debate) * 02:06, 6 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Exceptional claims) * 23:38, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Administrative powers: Changing to make clearer Administrators on Wikipedia are not empowered to rule on content policies. to use their tools to enforce content policies.) * 23:36, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Sourcing an scientific consensus) * 03:57, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Sourcing an scientific consensus) * 03:49, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Policy decisions by government bodies about for instance the safety of chemicals should not be equalled with a scientific mainstream consensus: Can't have it both ways, MastCell) * 02:48, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Table ‎ (top) [rollback] * 02:31, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Table ‎ * 02:27, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Table ‎ * 02:26, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Table ‎ * 02:20, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Table ‎ * 02:19, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ * 02:12, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) N User:Martinphi/Table ‎ (←Created page with '{|class="wikitable" style="border:1px dashed brown; padding:20px; margin:20px;" |'''Here is what you will see in the following evidence, as a general consensus of S...') * 02:12, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi ‎ * 02:10, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ * 02:07, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ * 02:01, 5 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ (→Non-SPOV editors to be pushed into disruption) * 20:27, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Time) * 20:27, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision ‎ (→Comments) * 06:15, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Oh clerks: keep it correct...) * 06:14, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Oh clerks: Actually, I didn't name names) * 06:11, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Oh clerks) * 06:01, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Tznkai ‎ (→User:PhysicsEng) * 05:59, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Oh clerks) * 05:58, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→What retraction?) * 05:36, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Mentorship: oop) * 05:31, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Scientific consensus ‎ * 05:16, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Verifiability, not truth: POINTED tongue in cheek) * 05:02, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Special attention to attribution) * 04:58, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Careful attribution necessary in fringe articles) * 04:53, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Careful attribution necessary in fringe articles) * 04:48, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles) * 04:42, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed findings of fact) * 04:33, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→ScienceAplogist should be permanently banned from Wikipedia: Agree with Jehochman and Seicer that SA should not be banned) * 04:32, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→ScienceAplogist should be permanently banned from Wikipedia: Agree with seicer and Jehochman that ScienceApologist should not be banned because he has a mentor) * 04:22, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Policy decisions by government bodies about for instance the safety of chemicals should not be equalled with a scientific mainstream consensus) * 04:14, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposals by Martinphi) * 02:05, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles: Another principle: WP:TRUTH generally ignored amid cries that we have to tell the reader the truth about fringe topics) * 01:40, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles) * 01:38, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles) * 00:54, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles: the scientific community can reject a thing which is accepted by the scientific consensus) * 00:46, 4 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking Vs. Promoting) * 22:56, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles: The ArbCom itself stated that parapsychology can be science, and that the denial of this is POV pushing. Resp to all) * 22:39, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles: I stand by what I did in that diff, it is a completely proper use of attribution.) * 22:29, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed findings of fact: Agree with MastCell) * 21:45, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained) * 21:42, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained: Still no answer) * 20:44, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Small study says that Wikipedians are 'closed' and 'disagreable') * 06:59, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Small study says that Wikipedians are 'closed' and 'disagreable') * 06:48, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed findings of fact: Resp to attack by Shoemaker.) * 06:46, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed findings of fact) * 05:45, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Wikipedia is non-judgmental; The facts speak for themselves) * 05:41, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Encyclopedic coverage of science) * 05:37, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Encyclopedic coverage of science: agree with Fyslee) * 05:34, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Encyclopedic coverage of science) * 05:30, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Editorial process) * 05:21, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Administrators and content policy) * 05:17, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles) * 05:14, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposals by Martinphi) * 05:10, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed findings of fact) * 05:06, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Thick skins) * 05:04, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Incivility) * 05:03, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Disruptive editing) * 05:00, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Administrators and content policy: response to Boris) * 04:58, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Disruptive editing) * 04:54, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→SPOV, Fringe POV (FPOV), and NPOV) * 04:50, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Civility and POV pushing: Very nice, TS, but mind the cliff) * 04:48, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed findings of fact) * 04:42, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles: Wikipedia articles should not debunk or promote a fringe topic. Proposed as blitheringly obvious, but in extreme need of statement.) * 04:26, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposals by Martinphi: Major issue proposal: Administrators on Wikipedia are not empowered to rule on content policies.) * 04:19, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Administrators and content policy) * 04:14, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposals by Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk): Try this for a start...) * 02:59, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→ScienceApologist has been warned about incivility) * 02:57, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→User talk pages: FWIW) * 02:51, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→SPOV, Fringe POV (FPOV), and NPOV: What is FPOV?) * 02:50, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Sources: Oppose. Not strong enough. This still allows WP:PARITY. Should say "prohibited.") * 02:47, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Disruptive editing: Oppose) * 02:41, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Content policies and guidelines) * 02:40, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Administrators and content disputes) * 00:21, 3 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Small study says that Wikipedians are 'closed' and 'disagreable') * 22:21, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Small study says that Wikipedians are 'closed' and 'disagreable') * 22:19, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Hi there!) * 20:02, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Hi there!: Question for Curtis Clark, and thanks for coming along    * 19:54, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained)    * 07:51, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained: The undisputed extreme disruption of multifarious types looks much better beside "defender of NPOV" than beside "fundamentalist stereotyped reactiary drivel")    * 07:02, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained)    * 07:00, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained: Just those articles he was familiar with, I'm sure) * 06:34, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained: you guys inability to satisfactorily answer this is looking like good evidence. So try your best...) * 06:29, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained: I've been so unclear...............................................) * 05:45, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained) * 05:43, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained) * 05:21, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained) * 04:43, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Let's see this explained: Resp to Comrade Boris, and not to the others) * 03:59, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→The context: An interesting little diffy to explain) * 03:48, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→When civility fails: Thanks to Boris) * 03:11, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→When civility fails) * 02:52, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Fear of "fringe theories") * 02:39, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→When civility fails) * 02:33, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→When civility fails) * 02:30, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→When civility fails) * 02:13, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→The context) * 01:33, 2 January 2009 (hist) (diff) N User:Martinphi/Links ‎ (←Created page with '===General links=== ===ArbCom=== ArbCom itself ArbComOpenTasks *(top) [rollback * 23:53, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ (→History of NPOV: rm note) * 23:52, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ (→Methods of POV pushing and context: (left Wikipedia)(left Wikipedia)(left Wikipedia)) * 23:51, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ (→Non-SPOV editors to be banned: Quote from Arritt on how he pushes fringe advocates to make mistakes re wiki rules and it's "fun") * 23:46, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ (Wow, fyslee makes for nice quotes.) * 19:49, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ * 19:48, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) N User:Martinphi/prep for SA ArbCom ‎ (Old evidence, sort through and see what we have.....) * 19:47, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi ‎ * 08:54, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Cold reading ‎ (→Shotgunning: To the ArbCom. This is an example of debunking I just removed, as well as a BLP violiation) * 08:40, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking Vs. Promoting) * 08:38, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→RS Principles) * 06:49, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→Kazuba: Answer Kazuba and DGG) * 01:20, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Fear of "fringe theories": My god. I hope the Arbitrators are reading this. Battlegroundnicks) * 01:01, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Statement: Putting the context statement back here, per Daniel) * 00:58, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Daniel ‎ (→Statement) * 00:52, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Debunkery: List, starting) * 00:48, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Daniel ‎ (→Martinphi =/= Mathsci) * 00:24, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Statement) * 00:23, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Context and statement) * 00:22, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science ‎ (→Statement by Martinphi) * 00:22, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science ‎ (→Statement by Jehochman) * 00:19, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Debunkery) * 00:17, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Evidence presented by Martinphi: Present your debunking diffs here. Section for anyone who wants to help.) * 00:02, 1 January 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:FloNight ‎ (→Your note) * 22:32, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→Kazuba) * 22:25, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→Seasons Greetings) * 22:24, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→Seasons Greetings) * 09:06, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking Vs. Promoting) * 09:03, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→RS Principles) * 09:00, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→RS Principles: Let me give an example of debunking... to TS....) * 08:51, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking Vs. Promoting) * 08:45, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking Vs. Promoting) * 08:17, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration ‎ (→Statement by Enric Naval) * 07:40, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→retired) * 01:21, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→retired) * 01:20, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Evidence presented by Martinphi) * 01:18, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Evidence presented by Martinphi: Address Coren's objection in evidence) * 01:15, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (I'm not a sock. Nor is MaxPont. I present the evidence as my own.) * 01:03, 31 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking Vs. Promoting: No way, Tony, that's POV pushing- you need to change policy for that) * 22:25, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking Vs. Promoting) * 22:14, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→RS Principles) * 22:10, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→"Attack") * 22:08, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→RS Principles) * 22:05, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking Vs. Promoting) * 22:04, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→RS Principles) * 22:02, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles) * 21:57, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles) * 21:47, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→The preponderence of opinion in published reliable sources need to take into account the varying reliability of sources) * 21:44, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Proposed principles) * 21:43, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Due weight is based on the preponderence of opinion in published, reliable sources) * 21:25, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→NPOV and SPOV are aligned with Wikipedia policies) * 21:21, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→SPOV rejection by MastCell: Parity is just a violation of RS) * 20:07, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→Seasons Greetings) * 20:06, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→retired) * 07:04, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Sourcing) * 07:01, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Sourcing) * 06:59, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Encyclopedic coverage of science) * 06:41, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Libel and harassment: Response to MastCell's evidence) * 06:24, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→"Attack": ScienceApologist yet again confirms he is out to get others) * 06:21, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→"Attack") * 06:18, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Stricter enforcement of policy) * 06:15, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Sourcing: with original statement) * 06:13, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Sourcing) * 06:10, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Encyclopedic coverage of science: this is your last chance because nearly all the NPOV editors are gone already) * 06:05, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Golden rule) * 02:10, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Context and statement: Note the dreadful state of the parapsychology-related articles: User:Annalisa Ventola, User:Nealparr and I could have made them very informative by now) * 00:13, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Decorum) * 00:08, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Stricter enforcement of policy) * 00:04, 30 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Stricter enforcement of policy) * 23:57, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Analysis of evidence) * 23:53, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Committee or board to deal with sourcing) * 23:52, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Stricter enforcement of policy) * 23:47, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Stricter enforcement of policy) * 23:43, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Anti-science mischaracterization) * 23:39, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Template) * 23:39, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Template) * 23:36, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Encyclopedic coverage of science: If our editing must be "in line with" a particular POV, it cannot be NPOV.) * 23:35, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Neutral Point Of View) * 23:31, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Sourcing) * 23:27, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Debunking) * 23:24, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Advocacy) * 23:22, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Neutral Point Of View) * 23:20, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Encyclopedic coverage of science) * 23:18, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Decorum) * 23:14, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop ‎ (→Editorial process: Agree with dream guy, remind of another problem) * 23:11, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Destructing editing behavior + potential conflict of interest: tweak) * 07:29, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Context and statement: Linking debunker, as it perfectly describes SA- well, a tamer SA) * 07:05, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science ‎ (→Involved parties: I am doing this because I want the ArbCom, by banning or sanctioning me, to formally embrace SPOV (or not). So attack away!) * 06:42, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence ‎ (→Evidence presented by {your user name}) * 01:48, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→The NPOV vs Mainstream debate: Dummy edit... I meant "it's a small problem area, you're right about the broad view") * 01:45, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→NPOV is non-negotiable: Response to Jimbo.... it's a small problem editor, you're right about the broad view) * 00:00, 29 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→The NPOV vs Mainstream debate: Coren, here is a little dose of the reality out there) * 19:07, 28 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→The NPOV vs Mainstream debate: You're talking about ideals, and we agree on those. I'm talking about the facts on the ground) * 06:43, 28 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→appeal of ArbComm decision) * 05:26, 28 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→Who is your heir?) * 05:18, 28 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→appeal of ArbComm decision: fixing. How'd that happen?) * 05:14, 28 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→appeal of ArbComm decision) * 21:14, 27 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→appeal of ArbComm decision) * 20:05, 27 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→appeal of ArbComm decision) * 05:10, 27 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→appeal of ArbComm decision) * 00:10, 27 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→appeal of ArbComm decision: No, the ArbCom and the community clearly chose SPOV, and that is where Wikipedia is going forward) * 21:06, 26 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jimbo Wales ‎ (→appeal of ArbComm decision) * 03:46, 25 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→Geniuses?: Responding to Comrade Boris and Kazuba) * 03:44, 25 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→Hmmm...) * 20:23, 24 December 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Martinphi ‎ (→User:Martinphi) * 19:31, 22 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→Hmmm...) * 00:12, 22 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi ‎ * 00:12, 22 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi ‎ * 00:08, 22 December 2008 (hist) (diff) N User:Martinphi ‎ (Retired, explaining) * 23:06, 21 December 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Dreadstar ‎ (→Happy Holidays and a Wonderful First Day Of Winter!) * 02:45, 14 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #1 - wording of Parity section is unclear: The Parity section is against basic Wikipedia policy and must be removed) * 01:59, 13 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Chiropractic/Mediation ‎ (→Proposed compromise) * 01:49, 13 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Incest taboo ‎ (→Intent to delete) * 01:46, 13 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Conspiracy theory ‎ (Revert to revision 251461928 dated 2008-11-13 01:18:42 by Arthur Rubin using popups) * 22:20, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Clairvoyance ‎ (Reverted per talk page; form consensus for this change before edit warring it in. Edit warring changes without consensus is wrong on Wikipedia) * 22:19, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Clairvoyance ‎ (→Rv) * 21:29, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration ‎ (→Comment by Martinphi) * 20:42, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration ‎ (→Comment by Durova: No way, Jose) * 07:22, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:John Wilkes Booth ‎ (→"Escaped" redux) * 07:21, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Pseudoscience ‎ (Revert to revision 250843278 dated 2008-11-10 10:11:22 by 119.11.11.137 using popups) * 07:12, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Clairvoyance ‎ (→dffsdfsdfsdf) * 07:09, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Clairvoyance ‎ (Rv see talk page) * 03:17, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #2 - Guideline is so poorly written that it should be rewritten from scratch) * 03:12, 12 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Elonka ‎ (→Review) * 23:09, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Psychic ‎ (Revert to revision 251186123 dated 2008-11-11 21:37:28 by ScienceApologist using popups) * 23:05, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Rupert Sheldrake ‎ (Rv POV pushing) * 22:41, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Chemtrail conspiracy theory ‎ (→break) * 22:25, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard ‎ (→NPOV tag on Chemtrail conspiracy theory) * 21:34, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Consensus, consensus, where's the consensus?) * 21:29, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #3 - Some guidelines and policies need to be reiterated here) * 20:05, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #3 - Some guidelines and policies need to be reiterated here) * 20:03, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #2 - Guideline is so poorly written that it should be rewritten from scratch) * 19:59, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #2 - Guideline is so poorly written that it should be rewritten from scratch: Change to oppose per NJGW's clarification: it doesn't need re-writing, just clarification, per others on talk) * 19:57, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #1.5 - Parity section needs examples for why it is needed: Question) * 19:53, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Jerry Rawlings ‎ (Revert to revision 249832168 dated 2008-11-05 12:42:59 by Natsubee using popups) * 04:03, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #3 - Some guidelines and policies need to be reiterated here) * 04:00, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #2 - Guideline is so poorly written that it should be rewritten from scratch) * 03:59, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #2 - Guideline is so poorly written that it should be rewritten from scratch) * 03:36, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #2 - Guideline is so poorly written that it should be rewritten from scratch) * 03:34, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #1 - wording of Parity section is unclear) * 03:29, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #2 - Guideline is so poorly written that it should be rewritten from scratch) * 03:15, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #2 - Guideline is so poorly written that it should be rewritten from scratch) * 03:12, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #3 - Some guidelines and policies need to be reiterated here) * 02:28, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #1.5 - Parity section needs examples for why it is needed) * 02:26, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #3 - Some guidelines and policies need to be reiterated here) * 02:25, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #2 - Guideline is so poorly written that it should be rewritten from scratch) * 00:36, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ * 00:33, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→What the?) * 00:26, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→What the?) * 00:21, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #1 - wording of Parity section is unclear) * 00:20, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Consensus, consensus, where's the consensus?) * 00:19, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Issue #1 - wording of Parity section is unclear) * 00:09, 11 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Consensus, consensus, where's the consensus?) * 08:44, 9 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox ‎ * 08:42, 9 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Arthur Rubin ‎ (→Sewer Cover Barnstar) * 07:29, 9 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→step 1 - rough draft of new lead: doesn't seem to apply- "muddled" describes the current article) * 07:26, 9 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Evaluating scientific and non-scientific claims) * 07:25, 9 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Evaluating scientific and non-scientific claims) * 07:23, 9 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Evaluating scientific and non-scientific claims) * 07:15, 9 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→step 1 - rough draft of new lead) * 07:11, 9 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Evaluating scientific and non-scientific claims) * 07:05, 9 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→step 1 - rough draft of new lead) * 23:26, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→step 1 - rough draft of new lead) * 22:45, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→step 1 - rough draft of new lead) * 22:39, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→step 1 - rough draft of new lead) * 22:29, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox ‎ (→Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox) * 09:42, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Vassyana ‎ (→A question/clarification on NPOV & NOR) * 09:33, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Chiropractic ‎ (→Moving forward) * 08:55, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox ‎ (→Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox) * 08:53, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox ‎ (→Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox: Reply to OrangeMarlin) * 06:05, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Conflict of interest: Thank you Orangemarlin    * 05:58, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Page protected: There are no uninvolved admins who can stay uninvolved in everyone's estimation.)    * 05:41, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons ‎ (→Quick question)    * 04:22, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox ‎    * 03:38, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Page protected: Before any of these complaints against Elonka have any merit, at least one problem must be solved)    * 03:12, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Rupert Sheldrake ‎ (→Carroll quote)    * 02:59, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons ‎ (→Quick question) * 02:58, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons ‎ (→Quick question) * 02:55, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons ‎ (→Listing relevant BLP pages) * 02:48, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Conflict of interest: right place) * 02:47, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Completely unacceptable block by an admin.: Seems like the software shuffles things when you reload an edit page?) * 02:44, 6 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Completely unacceptable block by an admin.: Edit conflict) * 19:55, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:FloNight ‎ (→Kuban Kazak-Hillock arbcom case) * 19:48, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Page protected: I want it to be acknowledged that conflation of myself and ScienceApologist is wrong) * 06:27, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Elonka’s ban of ScienceApologist and Martinphi from WP:FRINGE) * 06:21, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Elonka’s ban of ScienceApologist and Martinphi from WP:FRINGE) * 04:28, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Time for a rewrite of FRINGE) * 04:23, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Elonka’s ban of ScienceApologist from WP:FRINGE) * 04:20, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Elonka’s ban of ScienceApologist from WP:FRINGE) * 04:15, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Identifying fringe theories) * 03:41, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Time for a rewrite of FRINGE) * 03:29, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Elonka’s ban of ScienceApologist from WP:FRINGE: I do not think that anyone should use this as an excuse to go after her Elonka) * 03:23, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→Elonka’s ban of ScienceApologist from WP:FRINGE) * 03:23, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→User:216.220.16.170: ooops) * 03:19, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ (→User:216.220.16.170) * 03:16, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Elonka ‎ (→Fringe theories) * 03:09, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Parity of sources) * 03:08, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Page bans: Time for a rewrite of FRINGE) * 02:48, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Essay: I would not have thought this to be so controversial: it seems obvious.) * 02:46, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Essay) * 02:45, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Essay) * 02:37, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→WP:FRINGE) * 02:35, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→WP:FRINGE) * 01:38, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→WP:FRINGE) * 01:37, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→WP:FRINGE) * 01:30, 4 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→WP:FRINGE) * 23:10, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Discussion) * 22:45, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Rupert Sheldrake ‎ (There, that should clear things up) * 22:24, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Parity of sources: suggestion) * 22:21, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Evaluating scientific and non-scientific claims) * 22:20, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Unwarranted promotion of fringe theories) * 22:20, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Discussion) * 22:17, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Discussion) * 22:11, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Discussion) * 22:08, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Discussion: I thought changing it to an essay for the time being was the least provocative way to go.) * 21:06, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Fringe theories ‎ (Get the house in order first. Nothing under this much flux has the right to be a guideline) * 20:59, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Empirical ‎ (Revert to revision 248261782 dated 2008-10-28 20:16:13 by 76.98.47.58 using popups) * 06:54, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Raymond Moody ‎ (→Raymond Moody) * 06:51, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Kazuba ‎ (→Ed Dames Prediction) * 05:59, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Evaluating scientific and non-scientific claims) * 05:15, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Martinphi ‎ (→It is the same old same old) * 03:23, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Edward Nottingham ‎ (→In re: "discuss on talk before reinserting") * 03:23, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Edward Nottingham ‎ (→In re: "discuss on talk before reinserting") * 03:19, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Verifiability ‎ (→An example) * 03:06, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Chiropractic ‎ (→Philosophy: fix) * 02:55, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Fringe theory representation in mainstream articles) * 02:51, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Edward Nottingham ‎ (→In re: "discuss on talk before reinserting") * 02:29, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Fringe theory representation in mainstream articles) * 02:24, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories ‎ (→Evaluating scientific and non-scientific claims) * 02:19, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) User:Martinphi/Status ‎ (←Replaced content with '') (top) [rollback] * 02:18, 3 November 2008 (hist) (diff) m User:Martinphi/Status ‎ (moved User:Martinphi/Retired to User:Martinphi/Status)

Martinphi's last 50 deleted contributions as of 16:40 12 January 2009 UTC

* 05:56, 12 January 2009 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . User talk:Martinphi/interviews (Blank page of interview content) * 05:53, 12 January 2009 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . User talk:Martinphi/interviews (VERSION WITH FULL INFORMATION) * 05:52, 12 January 2009 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . User talk:Martinphi/interviews (Rv) * 06:50, 6 January 2009 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . User talk:Martinphi/interviews (silliness) * 03:06, 7 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Academic opinion verses popular beliefs: Ludwigs can put it back if he has content for it) * 01:20, 7 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Proposing this lead, as a start) * 23:39, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Quality and reliability of published sources: Additionally, describing a fringe theory only partially, while excluding what fringe proponents or fringe critics say, violates the NPOV principle) * 23:36, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Quality and reliability of published sources) * 23:33, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Quality and reliability of published sources: The other link to policy we're violating here) * 23:23, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Quality and reliability of published sources: Okay, this is the general idea on how to solve the policy conflict) * 23:17, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Parity of sources: moving) * 23:15, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Parity of sources) * 23:14, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Parity of sources) * 23:03, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Reporting on the level of acceptance: Eliminate what is not about this specific topic) * 22:55, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Reporting on the level of acceptance: paste it here instead) * 22:54, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Attribution in fringe articles: not there...) * 22:52, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Quality and reliability of published sources: Pasting in) * 22:38, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Comment out lead because one writes the lead after the article) * 08:49, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Deprecation in fringe articles) * 08:48, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Reporting on the level of acceptance: New heading to take text which I just took out of other section. Note that the text is not changed from the current fringe article) * 08:45, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Appropriate weight of fringe theories in articles on mainstream topics: Single subjects) * 08:40, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Quotations and attributions: That covers it) * 08:28, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Quotations and attributions: I should save the import, then edit, so you'll see what I do) * 08:26, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (What is a fringe theory?: Need a general heading) * 08:24, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Scientific, pseudoscientific and non-scientific claims: Promoted the Odin section) * 08:23, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Unwarranted promotion of fringe theories: I'm promoting this section, which many will think of as the king section) * 08:22, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Moving whole section down: most people will come here thinking of fringe issues in mainstream articles) * 08:19, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Reporting on the level of acceptance: Applies to all articles) * 08:18, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Examples of fringe theories which warrant mention in mainstream articles: This is a sub heading) * 08:15, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Notability of fringe theories in articles about mainstream topics) * 08:14, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Reporting on the level of acceptance: Moving Jimbo quote) * 08:13, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Examples of fringe theories which warrant mention in mainstream articles: Okay, moving to a new heading) * 08:11, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Reporting on the level of acceptance: One idea at a time) * 08:09, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Scientific, pseudoscientific and non-scientific claims) * 08:07, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (What is a fringe theory?: Remember we're only covering one topic at a time in this revised version) * 08:05, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Putting this under its article heading, I guess.......) * 08:04, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (What is a fringe theory?: Promoting this section) * 08:03, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Reporting on the level of acceptance: Making this a main section, for all levels of fringe theory reporting) * 08:01, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Reporting on the level of acceptance: The heading "weight according to subject" doesn't belong under " Fringe theories in articles about mainstream topics") * 08:00, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Weight according article subject: move) * 07:58, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Reporting on the level of acceptance: Kept most of this intact, but not what is covered in other sections) * 07:48, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Notability of fringe theories in articles about mainstream topics: Deleting because we're trying to keep sources seperate) * 07:47, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Using independent sources: previous summary) * 07:45, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Notability of fringe theories in articles about mainstream topics) * 07:41, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Weight according article subject: Weight ought to be its own article) * 07:39, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Notability of fringe theories in articles about mainstream topics) * 07:38, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Examples of fringe theories which merit their own articles) * 07:36, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Notability of a fringe theory) * 07:35, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Fringe theories in articles about mainstream topics) * 07:32, 6 November 2008 (diff) (deletion log) (Restore). . Wikipedia:Fringe theories/sandbox (Notability of a fringe theory)