User:U1056662/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Choi Seung-hee
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article as we recently watched the documentary about her for class.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The table of contents covers all sections of this article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is almost too concise, it's only a single sentence.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? It covers everything from her birth to official announcement of her death.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is no section that discusses her impact on the art of dance, which I found to be a little odd. I also don't think all of her films are listed.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? I didn't think so

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, most of the information in this article is from a Korean book about her.
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The links I clicked on work, most of the sources are from a book though.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? I think her biography could be separated into smaller sections, I believe most biographies on wikipedia are.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, but I think a picture of her performing would make the article stronger though.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes, the images are public domain
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The only conversation on this page is a question regarding the correct translation of a word.
 * How is the article rated? Start Class
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? The article goes into much deeper detail than what was discussed in class / the documentary.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Its categorized as a high-importance start class article.
 * What are the article's strengths? It has great detail over her personal life and work travel.
 * How can the article be improved? Half of the page's length is the same book reference being listed. It would help if this could be condensed.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It has a lot of potential to be well developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: