User:UAAamy/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (Rare Book Room)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: I work in a library and I wanted to see an article about one.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The article is currently too short to have sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is very concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Not sure, looks like it could use some updating.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes. The company's website and article does not exist.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? You oould argue that it's about a project to make information more widely available, but for the most part no.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? There are no sources cited in the article.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? n/a
 * Are the sources current? n/a
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? n/a
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The first does not, the rest seem to.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is concise, I think it could actually use some expanding.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? It looks good to me.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Not enough content to do that.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No images.
 * Are images well-captioned? n/a
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? n/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? n/a

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? No conversation.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It's part of the WikiProjects Database for libraries.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths? It exists?
 * How can the article be improved? It could use a lot more content and updating.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? I'd definitely call it underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: