User:UNFGirl/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Lou Fant - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I was struggling to understand the assignment and know what to search for. I thought about checking for specific people. Several people I searched for had no page set up as of yet. Lou Fant did. So I chose this one.

Evaluate the article
The lead sentence and paragraph gives a brief overview of Lou Fant hitting most pertinent information. Some, however, is left out. It is concise, but perhaps too concise. The information contained in the article is accurate, but lacks details and is also missing other important information about Lou Fant. The article is written from a neutral standpoint and serves as informational rather than persuasive. Many of the facts are backed up by resources, but the resources are lacking. There are more available resources that could be used. The article is clear and organized into easy to follow sections. There are no images in the article. There are some good ideas posted in the talk page, but there are wide gaps of time between posts and edits. Not a lot of work being done on the page it seems. The article has a strong foundation but there is much room for development.