User:UNMls/Kuwae/LilAvenue Peer Review

I more or less just feel the "Climatic Consequences of 1452-1453 event" portion is way to draw out and overextends its stay for an article about a caldera. Along with that their where a few of the sources like "What is a Volcano Landform" that don't appear to be the best of sources for a Wikipedia article. More of an unreliable source than any as the whole website is covered in ads and looked very outdated. Another source is completely in French and has no real tie-in at all to Kuwae. Finally, your 9th reference doesn't even work any more as the link to the Nasa JPL website is down. Your information when it is concerning the caldera itself in the first portion of this article is absolutely solid, giving the read a clear and concise sense of what Kuwae is, even talking about recent volcanic activity from the caldera. After that subsection the article really just devolves into something that looks less then a reliable source of information.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)