User:Uggghhh/Medieval Scandinavian architecture/Bbonefield Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Uggghhh
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Editing User:Uggghhh/Medieval Scandinavian architecture - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Medieval Scandinavian architecture - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The fact that a lead was added to the article helps in giving it a brief description, however, there could be a mention of the military buildings and towns with Medieval Scandinavian Architecture, like Oslo. All of the other buildings, like boathouses, religious, and general buildings were listed and are a part of the article. Overall, the lead is clear and concise.

Content

I believe the content added is relevant and up to date, as well as interesting. However, I think adding some links/redirecting to another Wikipedia page would help strengthen some aspects of your chosen article. For example, Harald "Bluetooth" of Denmark or Trelleborg. I think being able to click on an unknown subject while reading an article is a helpful aspect of Wikipedia. Also, moving the links/redirecting away from the titles and into the content itself would make the article look more uniform. All in all, the content was very informative.

Tone and Balance

There is not much to critique here, because I found the tone to be neutral and not bias at all. Nice job!

Sources and References

The link for references six and nine does not appear to work, because it leads to a page that says, 'page not found'. Other that these two, I think your sources are reliable and informing.

Organization

Under Military buildings there are a couple of grammar mistakes and misspellings; well known -> well-known (first sentence), fortresses -> fortress (second paragraph, second sentence), The -> the (second paragraph, last sentence).

Then Stave churches there's no need for a comma after 'wood' (first paragraph, third sentence) and Middle ages -> Middle Ages (second paragraph, last sentence).

Under Oslo a comma can be added after 'Also' (third sentence).

Other than these few minor mistakes, your article was well organized and easy to read.

Images and Media

The images and their placement are pleasing, and I believe they enhance the article. I think the caption for the second image the word 'interior' can be capitalized, otherwise everything else looks good.

Overall Impressions

Overall, I found your article interesting and enjoyable to read. Good job!