User:Uggghhh/Medieval Scandinavian architecture/KendallUW Peer Review

General info
Uggghhh
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Uggghhh/Medieval Scandinavian architecture
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Medieval Scandinavian architecture

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

Your lead is brief and informative, which is okay. But it's tiny relative to the length of the article. Discuss why each type of building, i.e., boathouse, is a major aspect of Scandi architecture. Essentially, clip a little more from each article section than you have.

Content

The content appears to be well covered. There are some grammatical errors, but they are few. This article could be expanded in the future, but more sources would be needed.

Tone and Balance

I don't see any concerning, heavily biased tones in the article. Good job.

Sources and References

Often there is only one source given for an entire section. Also, the sources aren't great. Better sources can be found if you search UW's database for scholarly articles on the subject. Worked like a charm for me. You do have six or seven, though, so it's not a dealbreaker.

Organization

Great job. The article is exceptionally easy to follow along with. Relevant headings and subheadings.

Overall impressions

This is an interesting article about an interesting topic and it is well written.