User:Ughhwhatevertay/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Earworm

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article, because the topic was of interest to me. I have always heard of the term "earworm" and wanted to know more about it. I was happy to see there was a Wikipedia article about it. When looking over this, the informative piece was filled with evidential support and scientific backup, which I feel makes the information more legitimate.

Evaluate the article
When evaluating this Wikipedia article, it is important to note that it was completely neutral and even had strict scientific support of the psychological phenomenon such as earworms. What makes it a good article is that it was free from bias and opinions and served as a good tool for information. The links within the article were correct, accurate, and legitimate as well. Overall, I would say that the article about earworms was well thought-out, accurate, and useful for research purposes.