User:Uhhlea/The Aquadolls/Ucblueashmorgan Peer Review

General info
Uhlea
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Uhhlea/The Aquadolls
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User:Uhhlea/The Aquadolls

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Peer Review Lead In:

- Article is clear with the different sections of theme topics. Article has many well sources/references. Article provides a lot of information with citation's.

-A change I would suggest is add a lead in because the topic About/Early Life is a huge section and not sure what the main point is.

Article Lead Section:

- Not sure where the lead section is or what the importance is about the topic. Try adding a leading section and the main point of the article so readers can find and understand the article easier.

Structure:

- Sections are well organized in a sensible order.

-The section About/Early Life is a huge section. I think if you created about into a section and gave background knowledge in that section it will be easier for reader to read. Then maybe make a separate section for early life providing information about high school life there.

-The section Critical Reception has good information and sources but it is kind of challenging to read. Maybe try spacing out the paragraph's more or bullet point the articles and the different albums they had.

Neutral Content:

-The article is neutral and while reading the words don't catered to a certain side. has a whole section for critical reception.

-The article does focus most on positive information.

Reliable Sources:

- Most of the statement have citations and reliable sources connected to them.