User:Uhohcam/Witch smeller/Marsrocking! Peer Review


 * The sources you used seem good, reliable, and like they connect to the article.
 * For the first section, you might want to put the citation after the first phrase you wrote. It could further help with understanding where you found that specific idea.
 * The sentence you have written after the first paragraph does not need commas before or after "witch smeller".
 * In the Work section, you could either combine the last two sentences of your first paragraph or omit the second "commonly" for the section to flow more and be clearer.
 * In the Ritual section, you can probably put the sentence you have written with the paragraph that is already there because it directly connects with what is being talked about and isn't necessarily a separate idea.
 * I like that you have added information about the status that these women have, it is a good addition to the article as a whole. However, I feel you could include it in the Work section since it connects to the part you wrote at the beginning of that section about how the witch smeller work is mainly done in the public.
 * Overall, you have added valuable information to the article and it is all neutral and backed up by reliable sources.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)