User:Ultimus/Archives/2

Erfyl
Did I say nominator? I meant author, of course (shamefaced :) ). Sorry about that. NawlinWiki 01:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Serbia Liberation Movement / Army (SLM/A)
After seeing some of the new edits the author of this page created, I believe we have a serious case of WP:POINT. Wildthing61476 02:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

More to add, there is a second version of this page with is listed as an AfD. Want to repont this as a vandal/POV account? Wildthing61476 02:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
I hadn't even noticed that header up there. I'm sure "she" did that intentionally. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Experimenting
I was only experimenting with the edit function in the sandbox. Thanks for the kind offer though. --Jake2006 02:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/University of Applied Sciences for Business and Technology
Could you please take a look at the latest comments at Articles for deletion/University of Applied Sciences for Business and Technology? Thanks. -- TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 08:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi
You requested that the article I created be deleted. I have now added extra information to it. Do you mind if I remove the request? Cream Cheese Bagel —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cream Cheese Bagel (talk • contribs).

Mmm, Mmm, Mmm,
I'm using the template of There's a Home to create this album's article. It's done by the band Home Cookin'. --Zeality 19:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the template. --Zeality 19:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Psotos
Ok thanks for the help!

Feel free to delete my entry and according to the Wikipedia guidelines my band is not yet notable. I will work on that! ;) psotos —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Psotos (talk • contribs).

Redirect fix
Thanks for your help, I'd never done this before. Keahapana 01:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

so sorry!
Sorry! Im just a fan of Susan, and i can't figure out how o do this Wikipedia stuff...

im sorry if i violated anyhing!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Susan4e (talk • contribs).

too general
i understand what youre saying, ive been generalizing in the interest of time...also when i leave ones like i dont care..its generally because the reason is blatant and im injecting a little humor. but thanks for the advice Mdawg728 02:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

List of Kurdish press
Hi,

Please let me know about the problem with the title. The article contains important historical info. and I don't want to go through the lengthy process of deletion. Thanks.Heja Helweda 03:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Oops! I did not see the quotes :), Thanks.Heja Helweda 03:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

WOW! Please, gimme a break!
Hello. You probably broke all of Wikipedia's records: you took just one minute to discover my newly-added article on Raul Borges, and to tag it as needing Wikification. If you read the article's History, you will notice that I already remarked that it needs wikifying. So, you added nothing that was not known already. But it's Friday, it's late, I'm very tired, and I prefer to work on it later, if you grant me the permission.

Regards, --AVM 03:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

cancias tequila
why ytou deletion my canicas tequila medals you know we have the rigth the people know about all this, however give a reason please thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Calabrote (talk • contribs).

canicas
please this is a cancias tequila unique brand —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Calabrote (talk • contribs).

Episode Two
Hi, it has recently come to my attention that you labelled the Episode Two Third Trailer part (which i added myself) as a hoax. This is not true. The trailer can be found at IGN.com and I have just added some screenshots to the section to provw it. Do your research more thoroughly next time rather than just deleting something at the veyr most discuss it in the talk page first. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brad92 (talk • contribs).

My apologies, didn't readthe talk page. Glad it's sorted out and sorry again for the outburst. Brad92 (talk • contribs).

Thanks
OK. Thanks. Cream Cheese Bagel —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cream Cheese Bagel (talk • contribs).

I looked at your userpage. It is nice. Donny Doughnut 01:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

canicas
HOW I can keep the cancias ???? can you help me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Calabrote (talk • contribs).

Regarding empty stubs
Dear Ultimus,

I am new to wikipedia. I am interested in Security, so, I searched for OSVDB. I created stubs for the contributors of OSVDB that might evolve as a bio-graphy. Hence, I created those empty stubs. I am sure other security enthusiasts would contribute to those stubs. I'll also contribute to those articles whenever I am free.

-- Smith.norton 07:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

It does belong but not in this form. Let the debate first decide whether or not it's good in this shape.--Zhangshou 08:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

It's always better to have a new article (reformulated this time) rather then a copyvio one.--Zhangshou 08:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi. The Ion Neculce article does exist on the Romanian wikipedia but the guy who started it needs a little more info to make it valid. Agreed? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 09:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

No mate me neither! But what I can gather from the Romanian and google is that he was some kind of Moldavian land owner. But is this really notable? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 09:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes he is.--Zhangshou 09:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion tags
Hi, I would have tagged the article as db-empty, but so many of these articles that have been created in the past few minutes are created empty then have content added, so I (maybe wrongly) figured that leaving it would cover the lack of noteability if any content was added. - Blood red sandman 21:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

damn youre quick!
but give people a second dude, check it now (Berkeley Station (Capitol Corridor)) and see what ya think. glad you're out there! by the way do you know if there is a specific tag for an article which you know to have factual inaccuracies or blatant lies? Qrc2006 00:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Chumby
Sorry to the community I didn't make a very good article creation. I only hope the refrences will help expand the article. I did post 2 additional links to help expand the article. I hope to return to the page and see a greatly expanded article. --x1987x(talk) 00:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I believe it is notable, it's on engadget. It just premiered - it'll only grow from article creation. --x1987x(talk) 01:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

You marked my page for deletion
Safe Haven (Internet Forum)

I want to know why

--Megafan 23:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

can you leave my frined alone.....
my friend (megafan) decied to make a wiki page for my message board(safe haven) ....could you plesse leve the page alone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blaze of merc (talk • contribs).

No
In response to what you put on my page:

Can you be clearer? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Megafan (talk • contribs).

about your message
what rule did it break? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blaze of merc (talk • contribs).

Question about the website guidlines
This one right here:

The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster.

--Megafan 23:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

ummmmm
can you tyell me what ruel it breaks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blaze of merc (talk • contribs).

its not non sence
...its not....its where we go —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blaze of merc (talk • contribs).

Signing posts
Thanks for the reminder... :)

I don't know what happened there, I was certain I put it on.

By the way, good luck with the Safe Haven page, the creators don't seem to have a clue as to why it should be deleted.

--ChinaNailStorm 00:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I have a clue
It's just that I keep arguing --Megafan 00:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

DumbBOT
Thanks for pointing that out. Yes. For some reason, DumbBOT listed as incomplete some nominations that were indeed complete (as the name implies, it's not particularly smart). That was a mistake I made while trying to remove the duplicate entries. I just made the last removals, and I am about to be check everything. (Liberatore, 2006). 00:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

^The^Dude
It survived for 7 minutes &mdash; you're slipping! :) Tyrenius 01:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I thought you'd like to know! Have a star... Tyrenius 01:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Bricemanning
Hi Ultimus,

Can we get the full review process for "Bricemanning"? I am following Wikipedia rules. Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.199.146.230 (talk • contribs).

Systematic Approach
Hi

I have permission to post copyrighted material on this site.

I'd like to have permission to post it.

THanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.106.30.34 (talk • contribs) 09:27, 29 August 2006  (UTC)

Concerning Samidoun.org
Hello, i am the webmaster and member of the samidoun relief center. I hope you will visit the samidoun adress: www.samidoun.org and see the Creative commons License there. Anyways, the original content was created by several members of the center including me. you can email me on walid@riseup.net. thnx. walid —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.84.76.18 (talk • contribs).

Regarding Bryan poppin
It's not a hoax. Check Celebrity (album).

You'll see Bryan poppin on the page.

-- Nish kid 64 00:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Heh yeah. I was suspicious at first too. So then I Googled it and just so happened to see that the guy was listed on a Wikipedia article. If that hadn't happened, I would have surely thought it was a hoax, too. -- Nish kid 64 00:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Unwanted edits
I was simply following the "link" edit that apparently was acceptable on the "Petit four" page. I went back to remove my edits but see that you have been expeditious in your effort. Thanks for the kind advice. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jiwaniec (talk • contribs).

Tone
Why? I am confused. Renata 10:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Redirecting
Thanks for fixing it, I am a little green here Ziv Goldstein 06:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Reason for removing CSD
I don't feel that the article is nonsense, in the very least it enables administrators to find vandalised articles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.110.104.37 (talk • contribs).

Fixed AFD header
Thanks for fixing my AFD request. I have only done one AFD before. I thought I followed the instructions, but it didn't look right when it updated on the page. I'm not sure which step went wrong, but thanks again.

Justin 03:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Info pls.
Hi, I just deleted 4 of the articles you tagged copyvio. I also saw the comprehensive copyvio message that you placed on the respective user talk pages. Is there a template for this? The standard nothanks template doesn't appear to be so comprehensive. Pl. let me know. TIA, --Gurubrahma 17:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

2nd Dawn Online Page
I would like to know why my page was deleted. It is a wiki for a new Online MMORPG coming out in December. If possible, please contact me and explain this to me, as I'm on a deadline to finish the 2nd Dawn Online Wiki Before December and its release.]

Thank you.

DemanFlash 22:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Football bat
can you please give a reason why you nominate the phrase for deletion?

if so, please answer these other urban terms - just to make sure you know uban slang

What is "what it do nephew"

What is a "Strawberry"

What is a "Gat" and what does the derivition come from?

If you can answers these and you still agree to remove, I would respect your request. Otherwise, If not - I would be concered with your assumptions based on lack of street culture —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Footballbat (talk • contribs).

sorry about that —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vkidd32 (talk • contribs).

Dear Ultimus,

thank you for your help regarding the handling of WIKIPEDIA.

I am sorry but I do not agree calling the business-damaging rumors in the ANSHE CHUNG article 'content'. The passage we are referring too damages the bad reputation of WIKIPEDIA. As you know - and I know I do not need to tell you - the purpose of an encyclopedia is to tell facts, not rumors. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.66.4.148 (talk • contribs).

a friend of a friend?
so, who is the friend? small world. tough crowd by the way.

b. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.52.223.69 (talk) 02:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC).