User:Umelsa/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Microlearning

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I recently came across this concept of creating a learning experience that involves smaller educational sessions and I feel it can be more efficient for learners to avoid redundancy.

Evaluate the article
The intro leading the rest of the article seems to be concise, containing a brief description of the rest of content. In the main content section, the explanation feels somewhat unorganized. For example Instead  of explaining what Micro learning actually is, where the concept emerges from, the author seems to deviate first towards the classification of it, which can confuse the reader.

On the other hand,  reference to a study that regards the time span of efficient learning added to support the concept of Micro Learning. Another useful piece of information is the ‘examples and activities’ that enlists the whole process of learning in bullet points for easy remembrance by the reader.

Although It feels like the information provided is a bit haphazard, the article tends to represent  a neutral tone and point of view.

More than half of the references provided are from older resources and articles, hence the sources could be open to question.

Overall the article has functional information for a new form of learning however the composition and structure could be improved.