User:Ummtahanan18/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
WikiProject Television/Friends task force

This is the article I will be evaluating. It is called Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Friends task force.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it seemed interesting and intriguing. This topic matters because it is a friends related article. My impression of it was on ways to edit the article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? To be honest, the article was a little confusing which can be seen as a distracting. However, the article did relate to the topic.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? I think there could be more details.
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations? The article does neither.
 * What else could be improved? Needs more detailing.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article seemed biased because it seemed like the author was someone who watched the show Friends.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The links do work and supports the claims in the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Each fact are referenced with and appropriate and reliable reference. The information comes from other wikipedia sites. Some seems biased and some neutral.
 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications? Some sources do and some sources do not.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There aren't any.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is from WikiProjects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? The way wikipedia discusses this topic differently.