User:Un Bear able2012/Samantha A. Brugmann/LeahWodajo1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)User:Un Bear able2012


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Un Bear able2012/Samantha A. Brugmann


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

For the Lead, the writer gives a sufficient, neutrally written background on the following information. The only thing is maybe you could link the source to the information at the end of the last sentence in the lead (even if it's the same source linked in preceding sentences).

Given this is biographical and presents the facts about (no "primary literature sources"), it seems that the information given accurately represents the articles and is neutrally written; the writer pulled from direct sources that described Dr. Brugmann's accomplishments and current primary research focus. The sequence of information makes sense, and it seems to be a solid article so far.