User:UrnessTyler/Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton/RyanMcGeo Peer Review

Peer review
Reviewing UrnessTyler's additions to the Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton article

Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes as good as it can be
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? everything seems to belong

==== I would recommend looking into the affair that Hamilton had and seeing if there is anything you can add to that, because it seems like and abrupt change when her reaction to her husbands affair is mentioned. ====

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? not really, her husband is mentioned alot, but that is to be expected
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? nope

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? as current as they can be there are some from 2016
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? not that I could see
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes