User:Ursasapien/Sandbox

My Projects

 * Project 3
 * Project 2
 * Project 1
 * Father Martin
 * Savage

"And now for something completely different"
As I adore absurd silliness, I include the following:




 * How to tell if a cat is annoyed with you
 * Silly Things
 * Mafia (game)
 * Elephant (wikipedia article)
 * Deletionism and inclusionism in Wikipedia

Interesting quotes
-- Ned Scott - MalikCarr
 * "Edit warring" is a bad thing, yes, but is it edit warring to revert once or twice over a given period of time, when those reverting on the other side have provided no reasonable argument to the original redirection/merge argument? By some definitions, yes, but regardless, the solution is not to say "edit war bad" but to give an alternative. We need guidance on how to assess these situations, on when to stop for discussion, and when to undo those knee-jerk reactions.
 * That's the way consensus is supposed to work, and in practice, the way it does. Guidelines proposed, drafted and implemented by a few editors will never replace the consensus of editors. This is why guidelines should follow consensus, not consensus follow guidelines. It's counterintuitive, a form of circular logic, and wholly ineffective.

GA Candidates
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_candidates

Top Ten Things Ruining Wikipedia

 * 1) Editors that are diametrically opposed to an article's subject seem to dominate said article's content.
 * 2) Editors with, not only zero knowledge about an article's subject, but zero desire to research said subject having the tireless determination to contribute to Wikipedia.
 * 3) Too many single purpose editors whose only desire is to get rid of or include "χ" on Wikipedia.
 * 4) The philosophy that an infinite number of monkeys working at an infinite number of computers for an infinite number of years could produce an encyclopedia.
 * DIMEist (Deletionist, Immediatist, Mergist, and Exclusionist) editors who think their sole purpose on Wikipedia is getting rid of 90% of the television, video game, and other pop culture articles. Here's a thought, why not go after all the non-notable rivers, highways, parks, and schools?  I guess it is a matter of personal preference, after all.

Great essays

 * Just drop it!


 * Why BADSITES is Bad Policy


 * Content Authoritarianism


 * Deletionism is more harmful than Inclusionism


 * Lame edit wars (not an essay per se, but great nonetheless)


 * Beware of the tigers!


 * No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man.


 * A nice cup of tea and a sit down.


 * Don't stuff beans up your nose.


 * The Wrong Version


 * The Pokemon Test


 * The problem with fiction


 * Cruftcruft


 * Is Wikipedia failing?


 * What "Ignore all the rules" really means.


 * Beware the consensus zombies!


 * Words of wisdom.


 * The official list of cabals

Interesting editor list



 * |YOu've been given ample opportunity to demonstrate why it's POV and you've completely failed, homeopathy, pseudoscience, Richard Dawkins, atheism, creationist perspectives on dinosaurs, geocentric model, Kent Hovind, atheists in foxholes, mammary gland, Fat Bastard (character), obesity. George Orwell
 * First BP demonstrates extremely poor judgement at one of OM's articles.
 * ,, , idiosyncratic, counter-productive and disruptive I will however attempt to refrain from expressing in precise detail how low an opinion I have of you, your judgement and your reasoning skills. mudslinging admits to a limited knowledge of biology I don't give a flying toss Rvt vandalism?
 * ,, , idiosyncratic, counter-productive and disruptive I will however attempt to refrain from expressing in precise detail how low an opinion I have of you, your judgement and your reasoning skills. mudslinging admits to a limited knowledge of biology I don't give a flying toss Rvt vandalism?
 * ,, , idiosyncratic, counter-productive and disruptive I will however attempt to refrain from expressing in precise detail how low an opinion I have of you, your judgement and your reasoning skills. mudslinging admits to a limited knowledge of biology I don't give a flying toss Rvt vandalism?
 * ,, , idiosyncratic, counter-productive and disruptive I will however attempt to refrain from expressing in precise detail how low an opinion I have of you, your judgement and your reasoning skills. mudslinging admits to a limited knowledge of biology I don't give a flying toss Rvt vandalism?
 * ,, , idiosyncratic, counter-productive and disruptive I will however attempt to refrain from expressing in precise detail how low an opinion I have of you, your judgement and your reasoning skills. mudslinging admits to a limited knowledge of biology I don't give a flying toss Rvt vandalism?


 * 1 2
 * 1 2
 * 1 2


 * I believe that it is much better to have fewer articles that are all well written and with great sources, than having dozens of unmanageable articles that are flooded with guideline/policy breaches.
 * You can't implement policy on your own you are still an inexperienced editor malicious ANI report malicious ArbCom motion get easily frustrated when dealing with conflicts on Wiki and Project standards versus what the fans want
 * I believe that it is much better to have fewer articles that are all well written and with great sources, than having dozens of unmanageable articles that are flooded with guideline/policy breaches.
 * You can't implement policy on your own you are still an inexperienced editor malicious ANI report malicious ArbCom motion get easily frustrated when dealing with conflicts on Wiki and Project standards versus what the fans want
 * You can't implement policy on your own you are still an inexperienced editor malicious ANI report malicious ArbCom motion get easily frustrated when dealing with conflicts on Wiki and Project standards versus what the fans want
 * You can't implement policy on your own you are still an inexperienced editor malicious ANI report malicious ArbCom motion get easily frustrated when dealing with conflicts on Wiki and Project standards versus what the fans want
 * You can't implement policy on your own you are still an inexperienced editor malicious ANI report malicious ArbCom motion get easily frustrated when dealing with conflicts on Wiki and Project standards versus what the fans want
 * You can't implement policy on your own you are still an inexperienced editor malicious ANI report malicious ArbCom motion get easily frustrated when dealing with conflicts on Wiki and Project standards versus what the fans want
 * You can't implement policy on your own you are still an inexperienced editor malicious ANI report malicious ArbCom motion get easily frustrated when dealing with conflicts on Wiki and Project standards versus what the fans want

Request Administrator

 * Here
 * List of administrators

Userboxes

 * Userboxes
 * Web colors
 * Template:Userbox/doc
 * Web color chart

