User:User78632/Corporate crime/IwearHat$ Peer Review

All the content is relevant to the topic. The content is a little outdated with both these cases from almost 20 years ago, I would add new cases of corporate crime. The author does a good job of remaining neutral throughout the article. For your sources the author needs to add better citations. Adding links will not help your article because the audience will not be able to access the link. I would also add "According to" and cite the article. The content is well written and can be read easily. There are no images added in the article. The author did a great job of highlighting examples, but the author needs to provide more recent examples.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)