User:UserColK33/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
2007–08 Boston Celtics season

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I love Celtic basketball and this was one of the first things that came to mind. I have watched the entire season and completed evaluation training so this should be a good test.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is effective and inclusive without being too long or overdone. The lead section provides both a summary of the season itself and the context of the franchise prior. The content is relevant to the topic and up to date. There is no missing or misplaced content. The tone of the article is neutral and unbiased with no persuasion or fringe views presented as regular. All facts are backed by both primary league sources and secondary media outlets. Sources are thorough and recent with many authors and over 100 citations. Article is well written with no errors and a clear, concise, organization. The article contains images and graphs which are accurately cited and well placed. The talk page is mostly inactive post 2008 but has minor link maintenance following issues with dead hyperlinks. They mainly discuss the formatting and maintenance of the page as opposed to missing historical events or context. The article is rated as high importance for the NBA Boston Celtics and high importance for the City of Boston. The article is well detailed and provides timelines, images, and context to the season. According to the talk section only some link maintenance is required but that seems to have been fixed in 2011. I would assess such an article as well developed, complete, and concise. All in all a very good article.