User:Username89713/Necropolitics/Sancar27 Peer Review

General info
Username89713
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Username89713/Necropolitics
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Necropolitics

Evaluate the drafted changes
This draft is missing a few components that the editor is likely aware of. There isn't a lead or titles to organize and let the reader know what to expect. The sources are missing and certain key words aren't linked which would make it really hard for an average reader to understand what is being said. These points aside, the actual quality of the writing is good and the paragraphs are well separated to discuss and build upon the main ideas. The content does suffer from a lack of diversification in its sources, as the majority of points are discussed using Martin Arboleda's work rather than a bountiful literature review on the subject.