User:Uwmadartlibhb23/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Otti Berger

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate the Otti Berger article because it wasn't very long and I am interested in this artist.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

The first sentence does not describe who Otti was or why she was important. The lead section is short and does not do a good job or providing an overview of the artist. There is a block quote that would fit better somewhere else in the article or not at all.

Content

Content seems up to date and well balanced.

Tone and balance

Tone is neutral.

Sources and references

References 3 and 4 have broken links. References are all pretty recent (last few years if not last 20 years).

Organization and writing quality

Organization is straight forward. A section for what museums or institutions own Berger’s work would be relevant or what museum exhibitions her work has been included in. Writing quality is fine- the sentences are concise and easy to understand, but the style is short and choppy. Varied sentence structure would improve this article.

Images and media

This article has images, but additional images of Berger’s work would be relevant since she was a visual artist.

Talk page

This article is rated a start-class and is part of multiple WikiProjects.