User:Vale.ramir04/Pesticide poisoning/Cleefin Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Vale.ramir04


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vale.ramir04/Pesticide_poisoning?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pesticide poisoning

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The new content created for the Pesticide poisoning article is relevant to the topic as well as up to date, but the few references provided are not linked into sentences. Having the reference at the end of the sentence that just cited your source looks overall better than leaving the sources at the bottom of the article. The article would also benefit from brand new information rather than a summation of what pesticide poisonings are and how they affect farmers. The sources provided are all from reliable sources and very thorough with the information they go over, which is good. The tone of the new content is neutral and doesn't attempt to sway the reader in any shape or form. Another note is that extra pictures never hurt for an article like this, whether its statistics or scientific imagery. I would say that the article is slightly improved the overall quality of the article but would benefit from more additions.