User:Valentin97m/sandbox

Antarctic Peninsula

 * relevance: everything in the article is relevant to the antarctic peninsula
 * out of date or missing info: seems pretty up to date within the last 10 years but probably could include more recent information. Nothing seems to be missing.
 * improvements: more citations; contents could be organized better, editing down the sections to be more concise.
 * tone: factual and neutral
 * sources: links to the sources work, support the claims in the articles, sources come from reliable scientific & journalistic sources
 * talk page: level 4 vital article, C-Class; part of WikiProject British Overseas Territories and WikiProject Antarctica; conversations about edits, what to add/what is relevant to the page, the way they talk about the topic emphasizes how to communicate information & make the article more readable for others