User:Valentinapicante/Ley Trans/Banner18 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Valentinapicante
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Valentinapicante/Ley Trans
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ley Trans

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

While the original lead of the article was solid in the way that it provided an overview of the content of the article, the small edits made to the lead have improved its conciseness and clarity (ex . change from "it" to "this law"). I appreciate that you kept the first sentence of the lead intact, as it does "concisely and clearly define the article's topic". The original content from the article that you've been working on surrounding the impact and status was quite limited, and only really explored a couple aspects of its (I would assume) profound social impact. I appreciate the direction you have planned for your future contributions, as the original article does develop the other sections that you mentioned (passage, conception) in more depth. In particular, I would recommend doing some research on reactions to the law's passage from those who were for it (trans individuals/activists, particularly), as the original article does make some mentions of the Vox party. I think newspaper articles in particular will be your best bet in terms of sources to rely on. I would also suggest considering a re-organization of the article at the end as you add more information, perhaps creating a section where you expand on opposition to the law and creating another section where you talk about support for the law and/or the impact that the law has had on the lives on trans people in Spain. Overall, I like the direction you're heading in with this article and I wish you the best as you move forwards with it.

Response:

The other peer review suggested covering both sides under reaction and I also think that's a good idea. Looking into how the law has affected trans people since passage is also a helpful direction to continue research.