User:Vana000/Dendropoma gregarium/A.abegail16 Peer Review

General info
Vana000
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Vana000/Dendropoma gregarium
 * User:Vana000/Dendropoma gregarium


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dendropoma gregarium

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!

''After reviewing the draft and existing article, it appears that it may not have provided as much information about the species as one would have hoped. However, it is commendable that the content included in the article is properly cited in the reference box.'' The draft only posited that the specific species belongs to the vermetidae family and is categorized as a type of worm snail. Unfortunately, no supplementary details were provided regarding the matter. Furthermore, it's worth noting that the draft had a formal tone, but did not contain any subtitles. As noted, the author has effectively linked their added information to a corresponding source in the reference list through the use of numerical citations. Currently, it is unclear whether the sandbox draft includes a reference list, as I only observe cited sources without a designated "Reference" section at the bottom of the page. However, upon examining the existing article, I can see that a reference list is present. Thus far, all sources provided are accompanied by numerical citations, which suggests their credibility. If I were to give some suggestions to the author of the article, I would recommend finding more credible sources and spending more time on adding substantial content about the species. It would be helpful to collect information about its anatomy and morphology, distribution and habitat, and compare it to other species in its family. Additionally, adding headings to separate information based on interest would make it easier for readers to locate specific information they are looking for.
 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 1) Check the main points of the article:
 * 2) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 3) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 4) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 5) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 1) Check the sources:
 * 2) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 3) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 4) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 5) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 1) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 2) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 3) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?

I think that the article may require more work before it is ready to be released to the public. It is important to ensure that all the necessary research and analysis has been conducted, and that the content is well-structured and easy to follow. Taking the time to carefully review and refine the article will ultimately result in a higher quality and more impactful piece of work. In academic writing, one of the most crucial aspects of producing quality work is putting in the effort to research and cite sources properly. To improve an article, the author should invest time and energy into finding credible sources, collecting information, and paraphrasing it effectively. Additionally, citing sources accurately is essential in establishing credibility and avoiding plagiarism. By taking these steps, the author can demonstrate their commitment to producing high-quality writing. I noticed that the existing article includes a section dedicated to external links. This could be a valuable resource to enhance my own article and I believe I can utilize the same format.
 * 1) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 1) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?