User:Vanessaamartinez/Black Feminist Anthropology/Manofthewater Peer Review

General info
Vanessaamartinez
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Vanessaamartinez/Black Feminist Anthropology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Black Feminist Anthropology

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Everything looks exactly the way it needs to be. Although this is just for one specific topic, it does correlate the book on the topic of essays from nine different anthropologist when it comes to personal experiences. The only thing that I would point out is the small start for the novel. Even though it is not a broad topic like mine, the Incel, it is a start to when it comes to the writings in the novel. However, I dont understand why foreword would be an accredit source for others to try and indulge in. I think it would have been better off with the use of that link.

2. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article itself is neutral, it has no claims yet and I assume that she is slowly starting to get all the sources together. However, I would elaborate a little more in the starting paragraph. It is only a short summary of it. I feel it can summarize on not only what the personal experiences are, but also the construct of what this article has to offer. There is no bias to this article as it points out the the novel of Black Feminist Anthropology. However, the first sentence of the article feels a little sluggish. There is no grab to it, I read it and it makes me want to move on to the next thing. If she uses the article to grab our attention instead of telling us what it is. Other than that, it does give a straight forward answer that most people usually and tend to look for.

3. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The viewpoints are neither overrepresented or underrepresented. This is not a biased or a opinionated article that a lot of people like to do, and that is what I like about it.

4. Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Yes, they have citations and all the links work. Many of them do as some of them have personal incite to anthropology. However, it is only one source for now. Maybe she will grab more later on, but for now, she has links that are good.


 * 5. Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Each fact is supported by an appropriate, reliable source. I have seen it and it does correlate with the Black Feminist Anthropology, with sources relating to the book, and even outside sources as well. These sources are somewhat biased, but not to the point where it becomes over the top information.

6. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

Although the sources are a little out of date, considering one of the sources is from 2002, and the book itself is from 2001. Everything seems to be in order. The only thing that I would suggest for Vanessa is to start talking about the important or generalization parts of the novel and how each essay from the people can contribute the book as a whole.