User:Vanessajibarra/Evaluate an Article

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? '''All seems relevant. No distractions.'''

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? No, all looks relevant.

Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations? Would really help readers like me if they further explained each theory, I took this course last quarter so it is all very familiar, yet those who are trying to understand it first time may be a bit overwhelming.

What else could be improved? With how much information there is, making it smoother to read through and process.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Article seems neutral, covering all relevant theorists within Jurisprudence.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Some are explained more than others, while all are present, if able maybe expanding on the underrepresented ones.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? No bias/opinions detected, all coming from peer reviewed journals or university articles.

Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications? yes.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? '''people seem to be pointing out theorists that are not mentioned within the article, the author has responded with needed help editing because they do not have enough free time. There are a lot of notes dating back from 2003, first one titles "embarrassing". The article has certainly come a long way.'''

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is a level 4 vital article in Society, mixture of high/top importance, and a part of 4 wikiprojects.