User:Vanilla.swirl14/sandbox lessons

Evaluating Content
In the section talking about Victims of a crime many of the sentences seem choppy and don't seem to flow right, it also talks about a concept but doesn't explain what that concept is. In the next section about Consequences of Crimes has some grammar problems and has an irrelevant sentence about elderly when the article is just supposed to be about victims in general. Also in that section the writer could have written more psychological reactions that a victim could experience cause there are a lot more. The next section about the Environmental theory, the section could have been worded better and I feel like it is sort of repetitive and quotes word for word from some of their sources they used. Overall the article seems choppy and if edited it could flow a lot better and help the reader understand more instead of just jumping from topic to topic the writer could connect one sentence to another.

Evaluating Tone
Overall the articles tone is neutral and represents many points of view about the topic. The writer also goes on to describe the different types of victimization all over the world.

Evaluating Sources
Some of the facts referenced don't have citations so the writer needs to add some citations to the article. Other than that the other citation links work and support the claims in the article. Another problem with the citations is that not all of them have links to the sources in order for the article to be credible it needs to have links to all of the sources used.

Checking the Talk Page
On the talk page people talk about how there is too much emphasis on the crime and not the victim itself. They also talk about the term victimologist, and when researching this term is was not found so what would be the accurate classification for someone that studies victimology. The article is rated as a level 5 - vital article and is part of the Psychology, Law, and Sociology Wikiprojects.