User:Vaultern/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Book_censorship&oldid=1217929824&action=edit

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate the Book censorship article because book censorship is an issue I believe hinders the right of American citizens to freedom of speech. Moreover, banning books can lead to the loss of culture, expression, and education. My preliminary impression of the article was that it was well-structured. Also, there are a good amount of references.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of Book censorship is okay. While it describes what book censorship is and provides some historical context, the section feels as though it needs more information to provide readers with a good overview of what the article will discuss. The content the article provides is good. It is well-referenced and diverse but could provide a lot more information. Something that I noted is that the framing of sources feels a little biased. While not directly favoring one side, the article can feel like it does so since only opinions from on side are provided. The sources and references provided appear to be all well.

I do consider that the article is well written and organized. Its sections are easily distinguishable. The use of media/images is good (it contributes to the article). Overall, the article still needs a lot of work, as mentioned on the talk page.