User:Vbigau2/sandbox

Article Evaluation

1) The article that I chose to evaluate is Haiti reads. Everything the article outlined was relevant to the topic. It explained exactly what the company is, who it was founded by, why it was created by the founder and the different locations the charity operates out of and also the different other organizations in which Haiti reads partners with such as Amazon Smile.

2) The article is in no way biased, it is only stating facts about the organization itself, nothing more.

3)Throughout this article viewpoints weren't present here at all, the one thing I would have liked to see more of is the reaction from the Haitian people themselves, and their outlook on how Haiti reads has either helped them and their country or lack thereof.

4) All links provided by Haiti reads Wikipedia page work and are relevant except for maybe the last link which does take you to Haiti reads website, but the page it directs you to is about learning the Haitian language which is not relevant to what the article was detailing its mission to be.

5)None of the information provided is out of date, the only thing that is missing which I previously mentioned was that I would like to see either the percent rate of success or change their organization has made in Haiti once their organization was introduced there or the response from the Haitian people about whether this organization is helping them with their reading skills, or is the organization in their opinion really not making any changes.

6)This Wikipedia page has no current active talk sessions.

7) This article is within the scope of the Wikiproject Organization, it is however rated of low importance on the projects importance scale.

8)There really is no difference between the way Wikipedia talks about this project, from the way we discuss it in class.