User:Vdeba001/Pura Vida Bracelets/Angelo2415 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Vdeba001)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Pura Vida Bracelets

Lead

 * The lead has been updated to reflect what the user has added in terms of citations. The first sentence of the lead does a great job of establishing what the bracelet company is, and when they were founded. The lead also provides some historical context to the start of the company. The lead does not however, provide a brief description of the major sections to be discussed. The lead includes the total amount of bracelets sold, which does not appear anywhere else in the article. The lead is most definitely concise as it gets straight to the point of addressing the topic.

Content

 * The content that was added helped to establish the overall goals and social media impact of the company. The content is also up to date. In the references section there are sources dated 2020, I'm specifically referring to "The Pura Vida Story". The overall structure of the content is also interesting as it appears to be in chronological order. The beginnings of the company are explained first, followed by growth in sales and history of the founders. The only content I think is missing is the global impact that these bracelets have had, especially in the United States.

Tone and Balance

 * The content that was added is neutral. There is no clear side taken as the topic focuses primarily on a bracelet company. There seems to be no claims that would alert being biased towards a particular position. There is also no viewpoints that are weighed differently, or underrepresented. There is no persuasion used in this article. The main focus is to provide information solely based on the Pura Vida Bracelet company.

Sources and References

 * The new content that was provided by the reader has been backed by reliable source material. An example of reliable source material is how the author cited the actual Pura Vida Bracelet company "about me" section for further information about the company. The sourced material is also current, as most sources are from 2015 to present day. It also appears that all of the links in the reference section work which is nice to have for further research.

Organization

 * The content that was added is also well-written and concise. The content that was added did a good job in summarizing a lot of information on the company and condensed it into smaller sentences that are easily readable. I only was able to find one grammatical error out of the entire article. The word "charitable" was misspelled once towards the end of the article.

Images and Media

 * There are no visible images to the article. I do want to say that the addition of imagery would increase the articles visual appeal immensely.

Overall impressions

 * The content that was added to the article definitely helped to understand the history of the company, from its origins in Puerto Rico to the current state of the company. The article also uses reliable sourcing for the content that was added. The strength would most definitely be the contributions in itself. The content could be improved by adding more imagery. If there was visual imagery the reader could more understand how the bracelets look.