User:VebraScience/Thermite/Slownotdumb Peer Review

General info
VebraScience
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:VebraScience/Thermite
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Thermite

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: No changes to the lead have been made, however the lead is fine how it is.

content: Yes the content added is relevant to the topic, it is also up to date. I did not find any missing content or anything that doesnt belong, everything adds up and explains thermite very well.

Tone and balance:

The content added isnt biased in any way, it is neutral and informative.

Sources and Refrences:

All of the new information added to the article is backed by reliable sources, and there are citations to show it. Also, yes, the content added reflects what the sources say. The sources are good sources.

Organization: Yes the content added is well written, organized, and has no errors.

Overall Impressions: This was a good draft and I thought it was layed out well. It is well written, and I learned a lot.