User:VedantW/Ips pini/Sachi.sb Peer Review

General info
VedantW
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Ips pini
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ips pini

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, this article was very well written but there were times when the sentence structure seemed more elaborate than they needed to be; to improve readability I would suggest both removing or explaining jargon as well as making sentence structure as simple as possible. I think the categories used in this article were very relevant but some could be combined with others (e.g. Life Cycle Stage Identification could go in Life Cycle; it didn't need it's own section). I would look to see where you feel like you are repeating information and see if you could consolidate any of it.