User:Vegavegmarie/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I chose this article to evaluate because mention a actually society issue and it's something that I support.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, mention a clearly introductory sentence what's about the article and the topic description.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * I think no, because this article has to much sections and things that should have to be a priority on a brief description and doesn't are in the brief.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, the information I think is very complete and tackle the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Well, is concise. Have a point and very concrete.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * All the information of the article is relevant and related to the topic.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Yes, actually the last edition was made on September 20, 2020.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No, in my criteria the article don't have anything that's doesn't belong to this article.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Yes, it is about the movement to obtain the right to abortion without having any kind of problem, either social or personal.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes, is neutral is just bringing information without a point of view.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, there is not any claims biased towards a particular position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, the point of view is neutral.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, the article is just giving information to the reader.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, the article is backed up with reliable sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes if you click on the sources you can find it.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes, include Stella Browne, Marie Stopes and other women's who was feminist and favor to the abortion.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, they work perfectly.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * For me is very easy to read and very clear.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No, the article don't have any grammatical errors.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, have a good organization, is like the most important point to the less.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * The article don't have images that help to understand the topic.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * The way that we give a personal opinion, a point of view and Wikipedia have to be neutral, you can't differ or you are okay.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * Basically the historical information.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * I think the article need more images that show what's abortion and how the people get the right to abort.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * The article is well developed and  has only poor in images, but really the information it contains is abundant.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: