User:Vejvančický/Archive 14

Moravian language
You have other sources about the Moravian? Not from Blaha. Doncsecztalk 14:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I linked to the articles published in Czech media at Talk:Moravia, please, check. Do you speak Czech, btw? All the sources state that the concept of the official Moravian language is hardly realizable, given the variety of dialects spoken in Moravia. It is impossible to put together parts of individual dialects and create a single, general and official language. It would be ridiculous. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I do not speak Czech, but Slovene, Hungarian, Prekmurian. Replaces this sources. I can not comment on the Moravian literary language-question, but dialects also spoken in Slovenia. In addition the literary language is a artificial language, accordingly if it would be independent of Moravia, the literary language is feasible from every dialects. Unfortunately, in Slovenia the central dialect is the ruling, but few linguists was proposed the involvement of other dialects (Pleteršnik's dictionary)./Jaz ne govorim češko, samo slovensko, madžarsko in prekmursko. Bom prepisal vire z drugimi. Ne morem komentirati vprašanja moravskega knjižnega jezika, ampak narečja govorijo tudi v Sloveniji. Pravzaprav knjižni jezik vedno umetni jezik, tako če bi bila Moravska samostojna država, takrat je možno tvoriti knjižni jezik iz vseh narečij. Žal, v Sloveniji tudi samo centralno narečje je prevladujoče v knjižnem jeziku, vendar več jezikoslovcev je svetovalo vključenost drugih narečij (glej Pleteršnikov slovar). Doncsecztalk 15:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * We are doing experiments in Prekmurian (for ex. Bible-translation). But the work would only be successful, if the political situation changes./Mi tudi imamo poskuse v prekmurščini (prevod Biblije). Ali to delo samo takrat bi bilo uspešno, če bi politično stanje spremenilo. Doncsecztalk 15:11, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I replied at Talk:Moravia. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Enrique Quintana
Hi, when you wake up you can read this: I deleted Enrique Quintana as it has no claim to importance. If the portal requested it, there may be a reason that indicates importance. But on the other hand it may be just an unjustified request. So if you can work out why Enrique Quintana should have an article here you can recreate it or ask me to undelete. I am quite willing to undelete if there is a reason. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:10, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm awake. Thanks for letting me now, but I'm not the creator. I just asked him/her few questions on talk page, which is, by the way, still not deleted (see Talk:Enrique Quintana). I'll copy my questions to the creator's talk page. I quite agree with your reasoning to delete. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 11:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I considered you to be the only one contesting deletion. But i was mistaken confusing you with SChalice.  Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Nottingham International Jazz Piano Competition
It certainly isn't a speedy candidate anymore. Well done; thanks. Drmies (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It is a local competition, but it is in my opinion worthy of mentioning. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:36, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Havel
I've just heard the news about Havel's death. I don't know whether he would want to be described that way but he was a great man - as well as being the right man at the crucial moment. Opbeith (talk) 13:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, he'll be missed. A fascinating individual, modest and extraordinarily gifted. Haploidavey (talk) 13:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your condolences, friends. Václav Havel was a man of good heart. His life and work is and always will be a big example and inspiration to me ... I'm very very sad. Maybe that's because I realize how irreplaceable this great man is. A unique piece of universe is gone forever ... Thank you again, Owen and Davey. I hope you are well and I wish you all the best. Antonín Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Ville Ranta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Finnish and WSOY


 * Krishna Pauroti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Nepalese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you robot. I added the WSOY dab link intentionally, as the dab page contains some information about the publisher, while a red link is just a red link. I'll fix the rest. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 11:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
JetBlast (talk) 12:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

 * Thanks, C.Fred. Bakeries in Nepal ... well that's something new to me :) The infinite depth and broadness of our project, or of the world in general, will never cease to amaze me. Best regards. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Military and smoking
Hi, have proposed a move (here) of this page. I am notifying you as you apparently took part in previous discussion about it. Cheers, benzband  ( talk ) 19:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Malcolm Clark for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malcolm Clark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Malcolm Clark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.


 * I left my comment there, thanks for letting me know. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Lida Baarova
Hello, it seems like you were the last person who was editing the article about Lida Baarova. I just want to point out that there are many mistakes in the article and I just want to point out the correct details:

1838 Baarova was not allowed to act in Germany anymore but at the same time she was not to leave Germany which was an order by Gestapo;

1945 Baarova was taken into custody but due to lack of any evidence she has not been tried and she has not been senteced either! She merely spent 18 month in custody and was released thereafter;

Kopecky did not help Baarova's release from custody in any way. Kopecky tried, however, his important communist relative of his not only didn't help but also caused repressions against Kopecky, hence the reason Baarova and Kopecky both decided to emigrate.

Baarova and Lundwall met already first in 1948 but did not married until 1969, one year after Lundwalls wife died. Lundwall died already in 1972

Those are the correct details and dates according to Baarova's book 'Zivota sladke horkosti'

There are many more mistakes in the article about Baarova and I only pointed out those few.

--CzechMate1977 (talk) 19:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * You are absolutely free to fix the incorrect facts, however, don't forget to cite your sources. At the moment, I can respond only to the first part of your message. Stanislav Motl says in this interview: "...v roce 1938 byla vyhoštěna z Německa a u nás jí dal Otakar Vávra tři poslední role", which means that she was expelled from Germany and after that she appeared in her last three roles in the Czechoslovakia/Protectorate, in the films directed (?) by Vávra. Another article by novinky.cz says that Hitler intervened on 16 August, 1938, after Goebbels' wife Magda complained to him. Baarová managed to escape to Czechoslovakia shortly before the occupation started (in March 1939). I know 'Života sladké hořkosti', but I don't own the book. I'm aware that I don't cite scholarly sources, but I consider the mentioned news articles trustworthy. Any confusion in our article should be clarified, but always with the support of reliable sources. Thanks for your understanding. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 20:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * At least you have sense of humor, Bravo :) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

If I have nothing else, at least I have that :)

New article
Thanks, I have made some improvements to the article by changing the references into inline citations, which I hope will satisfy those who wanted to delete it. Deb (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear Vejvančický,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and

Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's

Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we

teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community,

and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what

you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community

[[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_82#Learn_to_be_a_Wikipedia_Administrator_-

_New_class_at_MSU|HERE]], where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my

students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training,

motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one

of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of

communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will

never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an

interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics

review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have

been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak

with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I

will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your

name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be

more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Young June Sah --Yjune.sah (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello Jonathan and Young June Sah. Feel free to ask me any questions related to the Wikipedia culture and community directly here. This is an open project, my editing is open and I have no need to discuss any matters related to my presence on the en:wiki behind the closed door. Anyone (Wikipedia editors and passer-byes) can ask me additional questions, but please, stay focused solely on the matters related to the Wikipedia editing. I won't respond to any questions of personal nature or other irrelevant stuff. Thank you. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

New Novinky.cz article

 * Thanks, Northamerica1000! The article is pretty poor ... to be honest, I created the stub to help people evaluating foreign sources in deletion discussions. It is an important and very popular Czech news website, founded the same year as Google. Internet was a completely different place in those times, I can't believe my eyes when compare with today's size :) Their informations are sometimes flawed, but their coverage of Czech topics is quite decent. Thanks again, best regards. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Efforts to counter systemic bias are also appreciated! Northamerica1000(talk) 07:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Natasha Trehan
I understand that my article entitled 'Natasha Trehan' has been speedily deleted. However, I do not believe that it was correctly deleted. Before writing the article, I read the 'Your First Article' post on Wikipedia and followed the guidelines perfectly.

1) I have gathered references - from the source itself. 2) I created the article first in my sandbox, and after editing it, on a new page. 3) It does not have an existing page. 4) It is not about myself, my friends, family, a band I am in, my teacher - I don't know Natasha Trehan personally. 5) It is not an advertisement - it is a biography of someone. 6) It is not a personal essay or original research - I have references from the source itself. 7) It is not a short article - it is of average length. 8) It is not an attack on a person or an organization. 9) I did not copy anything or violate copyrights. 10) It is in a neutral tone - I crosschecked with other articles.

I feel that my article should not have been deleted as I have followed all the guidelines correctly. I also believe that this is an important article, as this is an up and coming young Canadian singer who has a lot of talent. She might be the next Justin Bieber or Carly Rae Jepson or even Celine Dion, and by posting this article on Wikipedia, we are informing the people on something they should know.

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Natasha Trehan is an upcoming Canadian singer, and the facts posted in the article can be verified with the references provided at the end of the article. Also, the article is of average length, but will be edited often, and expanded as more videos and blogs are posted by Natalia Trehan. By having a page on wikipedia, Natasha Trehan will be more recognized and people will be able to identify her. In wikipedia there are pages of people who don't even have an image of the person. For Natasha Trehan, I have already been able to gather images that have been posted of her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TalentSpotter7 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

I thank you for taking your time in reading my post, and look forward to hearing back from you. Talent Spotter 7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by TalentSpotter7 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello. Please, click on the red link Natasha Trehan and you'll see why I deleted your page. This project is an encyclopedia, not a directory of all people in the world. Take a look here to become more familiar with the definition of notability on Wikipedia. Also, please be careful when writing about children anywhere on the internet. For further information check Protecting children's privacy. Thanks for your understanding. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Your kitten is not biting; I appreciate it
Thank you for being patient with me instead of biting me. We all make mistakes, and I was probably being too bold anyway. Why don't you sit down and appreciate your kindness with a warm mug of hot cocoa?

ChromaNebula (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 
 * Thanks, ChromaNebula. You are new here and you learn. Sometimes we learn through our mistakes. Thanks for your contributions. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Freedom Train
I have replied. ```Buster Seven   Talk  16:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I see that your User page is an empty Canvas. Would you mind if I created something I think you would enjoy? If you don't like it, you can always undo. ```Buster Seven   Talk  19:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I deleted all the useless chatter ... but why not? Use your imagination :) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I see that your User page redirects here. I will try to undo, but I'm not exactlly sure how. ```Buster Seven   Talk  16:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC) Help Desk assisted...```Buster Seven   Talk  17:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hehe, I'm not a big patriot, Buster. But our coat of arms is nice. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 17:08, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I will reduce its size and make it less of a statement. I am searching for a work of art to hang on the wall. Any preferred artist or genre? I see you like Opera. A favorite composer?```Buster Seven   Talk  17:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Many many many preferred works of art. Favourite composer? Shostakovich, Prokofiev, Stravinsky, Janáček, Martinů, Poulenc, Ravel, Debussy and many many many others. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 17:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Your improvements are really nice and funny, Buster :) I guess it is the first meeting of Shostakovich, Dracula and Moravian Eagle in the history. I added a link to my talk page. From time to time I'm contacted by new editors and they should be easily navigated to talk with me. Thank you :) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

User:Daniel Christensen/Starcraft Marine
Hello,

Would it be possible for you to delete the above subject page? The reason I ask you is because you deleted User:Daniel Christensen on 03:19, 14 January 2012.

Thanks, Gjs238 (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello. I'm afraid it is not possible. I deleted Daniel's user page on his own request. This is his sandbox and it is possible that he is working on improvement of the article Starcraft Marine (which, btw, doesn't look well developed). I can't speedily delete it on your request. Thanks for your understanding. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 21:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Btw, you can contact him, ask him, offer a help or explanation on his talk page. Instead of it you want to delete it. Why? --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 21:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Now I'm a bit confused. The page I have issue with is User:Daniel Christensen/Starcraft Marine. The page has not had acticvity for some time and the talk page is empty.  The user that you are suggesting I get in touch with User:Daniel Christensen was deleted by you.  The associated talk page does not seem to have any contributions from the owner.  It seems possible that all pages mentioned above have been abandoned.  Gjs238 (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't delete the 'user', just his 'userpage', because he asked to do so by adding db-user template to the page. A decision of an admin (or a community decision) may lead to block or ban of a user, but we can't "delete" them. He is still active, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Daniel_Christensen, and it would be very rude to delete the work stored in his user space without his knowledge. He may continue working on it later in the future. I hope it is clear now, ask for more if not. Thanks. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 21:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Anthony Christmas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

re:Hello
--  Tinu  Cherian  - 11:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Take This Lollipop
Thanks for looking in. I always appreciate an extra set of eyes.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for writing it, Michael. The idea (of someone stalking me through Internet and following me to my home) comes to my mind from time to time. It would be quite easy, despite the fact that I don't have an account on Facebook or anywhere else (except on Wikipedia). The major websites are changing their policy regarding protection of privacy, but I think it is a) too late b) just a masquerade. The situation changes rapidly, I remember the changes in Wikipedia's BLP protection and I also remember that I was one of the people opposing immediate deletion of unreferenced BLP information. Today I know I was wrong and I better realize the dangers and power of this project. The digital memory is powerful and unforgiving, your past thoughts and words can trap you anytime. And once you join, it's hard to leave without a trace. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 06:42, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

thanks
hi,

many thanks for your help, i've added some "sources" i hope it will be ok.

best regards,

chuck — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckMaurice (talk • contribs) 17:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bookies club 870 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Punk


 * Conservatorio Jesús Guridi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Basque

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Vejvančický,
Sorry for taking this long to answer your request about the autonomous paramountcy of Ghana for the Articles for deletion/List of rulers of the Akan state of Akuapem Anafo which is currently on my usertalk.I dont know anything about the autonomous paramountcy of Ghana.Thanks-yours  Netknowle  message me!   04:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem, it was resolved a long time ago. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Advertisement
Hi there Vejvančický,I have noticed some advertisements been displayed on wikipedian articles,can you tell me when and why advertisements were allowed to be displayed on wikipedian articles? It is not compulsory you must answer this question on advertisement if you dont know,thanks-yours  Netknowle  message me!   04:52, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, advertising is not allowed here, as far as I know. But it isn't easy to watch all the pages and edits and some articles suffer heavily from spam. Would you be able to give some specific examples of what you found? --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

The advertisements are becoming numerous as i open more wikipedian articles,i dont know wether you have noticed it or dosen't Jimbo Wales know anything about it? thanks-yours  Netknowle  message me!   05:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Anyone can edit here, so if you spot a blatant advertisement, you can remove it yourself. But please be careful and check your edits carefully. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

New message
Thank you Antonin for the welcoming message. I have created my first article today :) All the best to you and thank you again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atizinha (talk • contribs) 00:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Krásna Hôrka
I've nominated the Krásna Hôrka article for appearance on WP:ITN. Are you able to expand and improve the article in the meantime? Mjroots (talk) 08:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll expand it. Give me few hours, and please, check my grammar afterwards. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. The article is not perfect, but I hope it is in better shape than before. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

The Luis Andres Colmenares Case
---That is correct Vejvancicky! The arlicle is not even half way done. Thank you very much for your input and help. I'm new in Wikipedia and I wan't make sure I comply with all Wikipedia guideness.


 * No problem. At the moment, the article needs to explain the importance of the case and difference between it and other - less closely watched - cases. Don't hesitate to let me know if you need any (umm, maybe not 'any', as I don't speak Spanish :)) help. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:48, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Honoured
Thank you so much, Antonin for your kind a wad :). I feel proud and honoured to be a new member of this group. I will do my best and for sure, I will bug you with questions if needed. Thank you so much again! xoxo Atizinha (talk) 03:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15
Hi. When you recently edited TV JOJ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TV Nova (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Czech Republic
Nazdar! Hello Vejvančický. I noticed that you used to be one of the key participants at WikiProject Czech Republic. What happened? In the last two weeks I have assessed 3,000 pages for the project, unassessed article count is now down to almost 3,000. I hope we can work together to promote Czech articles in the future, I for one would like to see more good articles related to the country, it's a shame that the current figure is just 6 GAs and 4 FAs. Mejte se! Cloudz 679 13:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Čau! Hello Cloudz679 :) I noticed your recent activities (among other things, you've assessed a lot of my article creations). Good work. I still participate in the Czech WikiProject and I still promote Czech topics, but these days I focus on what I consider more important (reviewing and improving new content, helping new editors, speedy deletion process etc.) Let me know if you need to help with anything Czech related, I'll gladly assist you. Mějte se pěkně. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Message by User:Michal.horak

 * 1. I probably do not understand the system of work in Wikipedia. I never got any direct communication, only I see you erased quite a lot. I do not even know who did it. But perhaps it is saved in history. So I mainly need advice, how not to behave "rudely" on Wikipedia, but how also I could start to do some regular work, as I can see some of the pages concerning Czech history quite short and some also erroneous.


 * 2. By references, do you mean referencing according to standard academic convention? This is no problem, but you may imagine, I cannot guess in advance, where anyone personally would feel a reference is necessary. So I can always reference everything what I put publicly down, but I would find decent to be asked for reference before erasing. Especially in Premysl Otakar II.'s Legacy, where you erased everything I added, I was mostly only stating commonly known facts, most of which are in a textbook (Why do you think referencing them is necessary and how would you propose best to do it? I can of course go into library and quote the latest monographic. But this is not common practice in Wikipedia. Everything is also in Palacký. So what is better?). What was new in Přemysl Otakar II.'s Legacy were (some, few) my conclusions. It was not necessary to reference them, as they were only a deduction from the previously stated facts.


 * 3. I do not believe it is right to say, that Wikipedia cannot use itself as reference, because each page is worked on separately (and each therefore has another mix of real authorship). I mean, it is authors and editors of the referenced page, who take responsibility for credibility of that reference. And that surely (or at least mostly) are different people, than with the page anyone edits right now. I did not know, that this kind of references can be used against validity of my text, I thought, they are for the purpose of the reader. I would have gladly added many hardcopy references when asked. But it was not my purpose to circumvent anything and I believed what I do, I do for reader's convenience.


 * 4. It is funny, how you edited my addition to Božena (Křesinová) /EN, because you brought in an error, which I previously tried to repair. "Božena's low birth is alluded to in the chronicle of Cosmas" is completely opposite to what Cosmas says: he says "some woman", "quondam". He continues they met in the village, and then says: "she was of excellent appearance, of skin whiter than snow, softer than the swan, shinier than old ivory." In my opinion, this is description of a noble girl. He did not meet her, so we do not know, whether his poetical language reflects only his imagination, or something he has heard of her. If the sentence you leave in first paragraph, is true ("was the second wife (and probably earlier the mistress") - I would really like to know, what is this brave statement based in - than is even more probable, she was of noble origin. Why would a prince have other mistress?


 * 5. Cosmas used the word "quondam", in fact, because he felt ashamed, that Božena was Oldřich's second wife. This was common with early Christians, that they felt ashamed for their pagan ancestors. Exactly in the same manner uses Christian in Vita et passio sancti Vencaslai et sanctae Ludmilae aviae eius, about Libuše, the same word "qoundam". It is the 2nd and 3rd sentence in 2nd part of the legend. In this case, Christian was ashamed, that she (Libuše, who for the same reason is not named, but can nevertheless be identified as giving order to founding of Prague) was something interpreted by Christian Church as a witch, or professing other gods. But he also explicitly says she was a soothsayer. So perhaps he feels ashamed for this, and only omits name. Nevertheless, the word "qoundam" denotes in my opinion unwillingness of the religious author to state the real social status of the described person. At those times all writers were religious, so virtually all second wives, pagan priestesses etc. were "qaedam".


 * 6. Also noting the village (by Cosmas) may mean, she was rich, because there were no castles in Bohemia of that time, only few ducal oppida. And all other people lived in villages. Lord of one village was simply one of lords of those times. Name of her father could mean, she was of Czech origin, but also could mean much more, depending on her father's social position. Perhaps already Cosmas did not know this position and only heard the name, with no relation. That there were nobles at that time, we read in Cosmas. We know Oldřich's brother Boleslav killed many of them, and still they took part in the following fights.


 * 7. Dalimil interprets Božena in the view of his own national ideology. Dalimil is antigerman and from the point of view of nobility praises blood (or language) bond even with the village people. Dalimil reads Cosmas in his way, because it is possible to do so. But he explained Cosmas' omissions in his own way - for the Czechs of Dalimil's time it was already impossible to imagine, the ancestors had more than one wife. They had no historical science etc. Thus at the very beginning of Hussite Wars Czechs sincerely thought, Czechs are (and ever were) the best Christians ever - because this was what all living people could remember.


 * 8. I added reference to the CZ wiki page of Božena, because I realized, that it is being contributed by some people from Peruc, or working around Peruc. Therefore it not only contains more than the English version, but is also probable, that it always will contain more information. Again, if you feel I need some other reference, please, let me know. But I do not generally understand, if everything needs such support (like I do need to reference Britannica, and then everything what is above ...), or if only something. And if just something, how can I guard myself against such cutting like that of yours in advance, because I cannot know, what will be surprising for the editor?


 * 9. In the page Božena Křesinová remains one quite grave error, which I did not edit, because it was in other part of text, than I had worked on. I will leave it there, until I will get enough understanding of the process here in Wikipedia. I apologize for the number of edits, which is really my fault; I will of course need to pre-write my edits in my computer, to have some backup. I just had some time I did not expect and used it to try something new, like amateur. But I will try to learn.


 * 10. I went in to detail concerning Božena, as an example. Of course not much of this deliberation is suitable for the page itself. But try to beat it, if you do not take it. If you take it, please advise me, how to reference it. Or you yourself please give reference to the allusion stated by you. I believe, you must add to the sentence: by some of the readers. And then you see it is not suitable sentence at all.

Perhaps I only do not understand how to properly cooperate. I would be very happy, if I could leave somewhere "notes for the editor", as that could save much time. Of course I do understand the importance of reference, and linking. But I thought I would be adding them gradually later on. So please, let me know, how can I push through myself, and I will make sure to keep formal duties. But in fact I need to know how to communicate with the editor, if I can't leave notes. Thanks for telling me where the other language versions are :), I really did not know. But it is not at first clear for the reader say from Singapore, that he/she should check the Czech language version to find more local links. Thus perhaps the reference is stressing this link. Perhaps it should be moved to Further reading. Generally, if you write me: this, this, this needs reference, I will do so, but give me some few days, as I also work. Please pass this message as you find useful to achieving its purpose.

Thanks Michal Horák — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michal.horak (talk • contribs) 19:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for contacting me, Michal. I'll attempt to address the points you raised in your message:


 * 1) You have been 'directly' contacted and pointed to the basic rules of editing on this project by me. I'm not the editor who removed a part of your additions, all the edits are saved in the article's history, you can find it by clicking the "history" box (located at the top of each article).


 * 2) Again, I'm not the editor who removed your contributions. By referencing, I mean using Wikipedia citation templates (you can find a good introduction of how to cite your sources at WP:REFBEGIN, WP:CITE and WP:CITATION TEMPLATES). Template:Cite journal and Template:Cite book should comply with the 'standard academic conventions'. You don't have to add citation to each sentence, but each paragraph should contain at least one footnote pointing to a reliable source, it is a matter of common sense. Personally, I tend to ask for source before deleting any obviously "good faith" unreferenced edit, but I can understand that editors who watch and work on articles are mistrustful to large blocks of completely unreferenced text. Anyone can edit here and you have to take into account that you edits may be reverted. Referencing is 'not common practice in Wikipedia'? Well, maybe not on another part of the Wikimedia projects, but it should be common practice here on en:wiki. The facts you add might be 'commonly known' to you or to the Czech history experts and academics, however, they are not commonly known to a large part of our readership, and therefore the reference is needed.


 * 3) Wikipedia cannot use itself as a reference. I've already explained to you how we refer to an article on another part of the Wikimedia project. On a side note, editors arrive and leave the project, but the information they add often stays for years before it is corrected/referenced. I admit that it is a weak part of the editing in an open-source project (we can't force anyone to take responsibility for their actions), and perhaps therefore I'm always trying to remind the editors to properly cite their sources.


 * 4) I've never edited the article Božena (Křesinová) see the article's history.


 * 5-10) I can't comment on this at the moment, as I don't edit those articles and I don't have the competence and literature to provide a well-informed opinion.


 * I don't know what exactly do you mean by the "notes for the editor", but you can always find the names of editors who alter your additions in the article's history. You can contact them, ask, collaborate and contibute to a better solution. If you want to explain or summarize your addition, do it in the edit summary.


 * Please, contact me and ask for more if you feel I've missed to address something important. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:27, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * P.S. I don't repeat things that I said on your talk page, but I can elaborate if you want. Hope you don't mind. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 11:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will follow your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michal.horak (talk • contribs) 04:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

HighBeam Research promotion
Hi! Thanks so much for signing up to assist with the HighBeam Research project. The first step in getting this project started is widespread promotion of the account sign-up opportunity. Anywhere and anyone you can tell will help make sure that no editors miss out. We're keeping track of where the project has been promoted on the promotion page. If you notify people, please add ✅ after an entry on the promotion page with a [link] to where you did so. Here's a sample text you might use.


 * HighBeam Research--an online, pay-for-use search engine for newspapers, magazines, academic journals, newswires, trade magazines and encyclopedias has agreed to give free, full-access, 1-year accounts for up to 1000 Wikipedia editors to use. HighBeam has access to over 80 million articles from 6,500 publications, most of which are not available for free elsewhere on the internet. Aside from a free 7-day trial (credit card required), access to HighBeam would cost $30 per month or $200 per year for the first year and $300 for subsequent years, so this is a wonderful, free, no-strings-attached opportunity. To qualify, editors must have at least a 1 year-old account with 1000 edits.  Please add your name to the WP:HighBeam/Applications account sign-up page if you are interested.

Please let me know if you have any questions, thoughts, comments, concerns, ideas, or otherwise. Awesome to have your help! Ocaasit &#124; c 17:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Marcel Boucher
Thank you for providing sources for this article, which had been an unsourced stub for several years. However, this was unnecessary; I understand the purpose of the AFD process, and criticizing an editor for nominating an article like this does not improve the encyclopedia. I still don't think Boucher meets the notability guidelines ("trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability"), but that's just my opinion and we can agree to disagree. All the best,  Miniapolis  ( talk ) 01:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't mean to offend you. A person (an expert in his field, in this case) mentioned in hundreds of books and news articles is, in my opinion, of sufficient public interest to warrant an article in this encyclopedia. Of course, we can agree or disagree ... it is an open discussion. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

OrganisedMinds
Hi,

I'd like to re-create the page about OrganisedMinds since there is now a press coverage to undermine to relevance. But before I do that I wanted to check with you that is OK.

Best regards, Martin Blaha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin.blaha (talk • contribs) 08:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, you are the founder of the company ; are you here to promote your business? I'm afraid it is impossible, this project is an encyclopedia, not a free business directory or an advertising space. Thanks for your understanding. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, that's true, I'm one of the founders but it's not only about promotion, it's also for completing the references especially on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_collaborative_software. We've got a couple of hundreds people working with our software. Martin.blaha (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Btw, I still can't find any independent evidence showing that your company meets our notability requirements. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Please check i.g.: http://www.web2null.de/organisedminds, http://wwwhatsnew.com/2012/02/25/organisedminds-para-organizar-equipos-de-trabajo/ http://www.killerstartups.com/Web-App-Tools/organisedminds-com-online-business-collaboration Martin.blaha (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Can I proceed with creating the article?


 * web2null seems to be a website (öffentliche Sammelalbum/public "scratchbook") where anyone can promote a company or business, and it cannot be considered an independent source
 * wwwhatsnew.com is a similar website (in Spanish)
 * killerstartups.com - see this, Martin. I can immediatelly start my own profile informing about my own start-up company.


 * The sources you cite cannot be considered reliable and independent of the subject. They say nothing about the encyclopedic significance of your company. I'm sorry. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Jennifer Crocker
Hi, I don't think it's ever been the case that an article has to be nominated for a speedy by someone other than an admin prior to deletion. An example would be a blp prod, where the prod is added simply because of a lack of sources, but the article is spam/nn anyway. Nevertheless, I'll explain to the creator as you suggest. I always do this if asked anyway  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?


 * Actually, you're right, the current version probably isn't suitable for speedy deletion, restored  Jimfbleak - </b> talk to me?  10:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Pranic healing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pranic healing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pranic healing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 15:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. I left my comment in the discussion. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Věra Vovsová
I am sorry there is not much notice given to the works of Věra Vovsová, but there has been more mention of her in the last century. Sadly, some information I have cannot be referenced, because it is from Vovsová´s personal belongings (her writing and paintings). It was a gift from one of Vovsová´s surviving relatives along with a few of her paintings. Anyway, if the page must be deleted, I am sorry for causing you any inconvenience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highschoolpuppettier (talk • contribs) 15:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I´m new here; I forgot to sign myself when I posted my comment on Vovsová Highschoolpuppettier (talk) 15:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That's OK, I replied on your talk page. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Věra Vovsová
Dear Mr. Vejvančický, thank you for your support. I am trying to find better references and as a matter of fact, I am trying to arrange a meeting with one of Vovsová´s relatives to see if they have archives or any documents on that topic. I hope I can manage by the end of the year if that´s all right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highschoolpuppettier (talk • contribs) 15:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

La Digue
Hello, I really need your help. I contributed quite a lot to an article about the Seychelles island La Digue, which is in WikiProject Africa, but I can´t figure out how to have it re-evaluated. It was a stub before I started gathering up sources, but I think that it is beyond that category now. Could you tell me how to get the page re-evaluated please? Thank you. --Highschoolpuppettier (talk) 17:37, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * It is a beautiful place and you did excellent work, Highschoolpuppettier. I've changed the assessment to C-Class, as I think the article is far better than stub or start class. But I have very little experience with the assessment :) Btw, I don't know what kind of reference tool are you using, but there is a bug in formatting. Here is an example:  name="La Digue History" group=History> . The parameters  name=  and  group=  can't work together like that, and there's a problem also with the duplicated closing  > . I've fixed it, see the diff. For further information, see Citation_templates. Personally, I use this: Curlybrackets-button-bg.png (the 'curly bracket' button in the editing window above). When you click it, you can pick a relevant citation template, fill the boxes and add a citation (the parameter  name=  is at the bottom, in the section "Reference name:". There are, of course, other options, but I consider this quite handy. Hope that helps, and ask for more if not. But it is really a minor issue :) Thanks for your contributions, keep up the good work. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:21, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! --Highschoolpuppettier (talk) 09:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)