User:Vejvančický/Archive 5

Will hurd bio
I have posted a biography of Will Hurd. The reason it was nominated for speedy deletion states that the article is about the person himself, and not his accomplishements. However, the majority of the article talks about his involvement in the Bonfire at Texans A&M University and his courageous work with counterrorism, etc which are all properly cited from newspaper articles and publications.

I understand the rules for biographies are more regulated than any other type of article, but I believe this article steadily meets the criteria of a notable person mentioned in the news, newspapers and on the internet.

I motion to keep this article.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamHurd (talk • contribs) 16:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

The article has been now listed for deletion without further explanation. Can I please have an updated explanation from more than just one moderator?

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamHurd (talk • contribs) 17:16, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course, the main reason of my AfD nomination is to obtain more opinions. Personally I think your article fails this criterion: The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. Nothing personal; I'm just trying to help to maintain the level of this encyclopedia. --Vejvančický (talk) 21:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar
Vejvančický:

Thank you. I'm truly honored.

Let me know if I can ever help with anything.

Cordially, Sherlock4000 (talk) 09:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Irena Troupová
Hi there. I just noticed this article. I'm not sure if its worth rescuing or not. Perhaps you are more familiar with the subject?Singingdaisies (talk) 00:33, 7 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Singingdaisies. Troupová isn't the best known singer in the Czech Republic, but I think she meets our criteria for musicians. The article is very badly translated version of this profile at the website of Collegium Musicum Brno. However, I've found other independent sources and indications of notability - she performs at early music festivals and occasionally records for notable record labels. Unfortunately, most of my sources are in Czech language. Check the articles again, please. I've also removed the prod template, I think the AfD and broader discussion would be more transparent. The reason for deletion was strange, unrelated to notability of that person. --Vejvančický (talk) 14:30, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, Vejvančický. I understand the removal of the PROD tag, but I now believe that it is an advertisement of this person's accomplishments. I'm not going to take it to AfD yet. But I'll place a NotEnglish tag for dual fluency, so that someone can come in and clean it up and wikify it. I'll look at it again and decide then after that. If you have any other comments or concerns, please do not hesitate to reply to me under this article's section there. Cheers, AeonicOmega  (Watcha say?)  16:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Greetings and questions
First of all, thank you for your warm and helpful welcome to Wikipedia. I have a question about a picture that I would like to place on an article that I have created. Dr. Edward F. Hills was an important contributor to the TR/KJV issue. There were no articles on him, so I took it upon myself to write something about him. I've got to polish up my article (and right now I am not in my office where I can do some serious citations of facts about the man). My question is...how or who may I speak to, in order to legally place his picture on the article? The picture that I have is the one located at the back of his famous book: The King James Version Defended. He, of course, is dead, so how may I go about legally doing this? I really would like to place a picture of the man, and it makes for a better article right? I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you and have a great rest of the week. Bhardecker 03:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhardecker (talk • contribs)


 * Hello Bhardecker. According to your website you have the permission by the copyright owners. You can find an useful instruction here. Have a good week as well :) --Vejvančický (talk) 09:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Kona Brewing Company
Hi Vejvancicky, I helped update Kona Brewing Company's site and then an editor recently said it sounded like it was written by the company's marketing dept. It wasn't; it was written by me from a lot of sources I pulled information from. Since I got that message last week, I have gone in changed some of the language, but mostly tied a lot of the information to citations and online references. Do you mind taking a look at it now and letting me know if you think it is strong enough now with all the references I added for me to remove the heading? You were really helpful with the last article I did. Thank you Plantsuit (talk) 23:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello Plantsuit. Your improvement of this "beer article" is really good, it is much better than the previous version. You also improved sourcing and I think the template is superfluous. If you finished your work on it, you can remove the tag, of course. I've found also this edit by User:Gentgeen. I have to admit, that the note in his edit summary is valid. Some of the claims and quotations in the sections Company History and Beer Recipes and Sourcing are not encyclopedic, in my opinion. The examples are here:


 * "A mahogany log lifted from the shores of Kailua Bay (used to adorn the acacia koa wood bar) and rusty corrugated tin from an old distillery helped transform the ink-smudged pressroom into a little hops-flavored oasis,"
 * "the Kona Brewery has been a local favorite practically since it opened. Good food, good local beer (go for the sampler and try them all), and an outdoor patio with nightly live music acts make sure it stays that way."
 * According to Davis, the strategy was simple: “Make sure we made great beer, get it to market, and hand out coasters."


 * You provide citations, which is good, however, I think that encyclopedic article should stay as informative as possible and should avoid "promotional" tone. It is better to write in a neutral and descriptive way, even if you love that beer :) This is just my opinion. Have a good day. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Dida Alsaffar
Hey I am a Pro footballer (or soccer player if your American) and I was wondering if you could allow my Wikipedia page? It was deleted about a week ago, because I have no articles to show of my career, but hoping to get hold of some soon. In the meantime however a lot clubs look at me on the web, so i was wondering if you could put back my Wikipedia page? Thanks.

Regards, Dida Alsaffar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swordofking (talk • contribs) 19:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello Dida. This is an encyclopedia. We don't have an article about every football player on the planet. Look at the notability criteria here: WP:FOOTY/Notability. Good luck with your career. --Vejvančický (talk) 09:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi.
I don't mind my speedy deletions getting declined, but how was that incorrect? I tagged it with A7, which is several things. In this case, it was a company or organization. - Zhang He (talk) 07:18, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Zhang He. The nominated article was a clumsy redirect created by a new user. In my opinion, the article Maestro Wilson Fonseca Airport should be renamed to Santarém Airport, however, it is valid and meets our notability criteria. The tag was incorrect. Have a nice day. --Vejvančický (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

FYI
Just a courtesy note - you and I had both left attack warning notices on the same user's page just now - but I have removed the name of the person they were attacking because even that may be bad to have hanging around. Just wanted to let you know I did it because I refactored your comment at the same time as mine. 7 06:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. Thanks for reminding me that, 7. Next time I'll do it myself. --Vejvančický (talk) 06:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well - you did better than I did. I stupidly used twinkle and it put the full article name in the edit summary which can only be deleted by a steward with oversight...  Hopefully the account will just get blocked and purged.    7  06:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

And we have a winner!
Vej, that looks terrific. The orignal failed to establish the notability and it had been tagged as a speedy. Thanks for letting me know you'd recreated it. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Agrestius
Hi Vejvancicky, he is Agrestius of Lugo. The article is very laconic really, but I hope that mates like you can help me to extend it. Thanks--Nuninho Martins (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I've added the reference to the article. Nuninho, you seem to be more familiar with that topic and you should add references to each of your new articles, it's not so difficult. I've also created Category:Galician clergy, it could be useful for better orientation. Please, respond at my talk page, not at my user page. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Rapsódia na záhorácke motívy
Hello Vejvančický, Would you mind helping me with a translation from Slovak to English? Slovak composer Aladár Móži wrote a work entitled: Rapsódia na záhorácke motívy pre violu a klavír -- Rhapsody on _____ Themes for viola and piano. I can't find the correct way to translate "záhorácke". Should this be Záhorácko, Záhorácka, or something else? Thanks for your help. Hrdinský (talk) 23:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Mockrát děkuji! Hrdinský (talk) 02:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Brenden Adams
Please add the article of Brenden Adams.

Brenden Adams born: September 20, 1995 height: 7'4.6" location: Ellensburg, WA, USA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.210.152.57 (talk) 07:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. Could you identify the subject of your article and support it with reliable third-party sources? The current version doesn't meet our criteria for inclusion, as it contains only name and few biographical facts. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: New Zealand - Malaysia Free Trade Agreement
The article will certainly be expanded on over time, including background, economics etc. Thanks for adding the info. --SamB135TalkContribs 08:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I still think you should develop your article as a section of Malaysia – New Zealand relations. It would be better than split up the information into many little articles. The New Zealand - Malaysia Free Trade Agreement could serve as an useful redirect. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:15, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Johan Andresen
Hi. I'm sorry but I do not understand the speedy deletion. It is not a test page, I used the article wizard to create it. Please let me know if I did it wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alis grave nil (talk • contribs) 13:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello Alis. The article was nominated for deletion as a test page by User:JMS Old Al. I disagree with his rationale and I've removed the tag. I attempted to support your claims with informations found in the links which you provided, and I added another sources in English language. This is surely not a speedy deletion candidate. Please, be careful when you write about living people here on Wikipedia and add direct citation to every possible controversial claim. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your help. I think the citation markup used in Wikipedia is very hard for a newcomer to use, especially those who are not tech-savvy. I suppose you are right that there should have been a direct citation, but I did provide a source to verify it, and can probably provide more if need be. I promise that I'll clean up the article later, so you do not have to work on it further. Again thanks, and sorry for wasting your time. Alis grave nil (talk) 13:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree, the citation templates could be a bit confusing for a newbie. You can simply add the link to your source and put the Wiki markup  at the bottom of the article.


 * An example here:

Johan Andresen is a Norwegian industrialist and investor.

---

---

---


 * When you save the page, the result is:

Johan Andresen is a Norwegian industrialist and investor.

---

---

---


 * http://www.kfsm.com/business/sns-506a7fd3d42d4a08886cf562426d09b5-2,0,1096596.photo

It isn't perfect, just a basic principle. For better explanation, look at Citation templates. Hope that helps. --Vejvančický (talk) 14:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Newbie treatment
Hi Vejvančický!

Because you interacted with User:Alis grave nil, you unwittingly became a participant in WP:NEWT. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my edits under that name. However, I sincerely believe that looking at the way new users are treated, and where we can improve, will be beneficial to Wikipedia in the long run. The project is always looking to recruit new, dedicated editors, and I think it is very important that new users acting in good faith feels welcomed.

I think you handled yourself very well, and your feedback is most welcome on the project page.

Again, sorry for the misrepresentation. If there's anything I can do to make up for your lost time, please let me know. Regards, decltype (talk) 09:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * On third thoughts, I'll reply on the project page. decltype (talk) 16:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * As for the wasted time, I am thinking in particular of the explanation re. citations. When I first started editing I really had problems understanding them, but I can use them without much problems now :) Regards, decltype (talk) 16:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks so much for the help on Yes Giantess! Nice to see a friendly wiki user every once in a while. Connor Mason 23:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Siruvarmalar
You are right. At this juncture, I do not have enough material for that to be a separate page. Better to wait for that till then right. Thank you very much. Have a nice weekend. Its a rainy one here in Madurai, India.

Arjunsubburaj (talk) 11:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Dinamalar
Whoa, just noticed that this user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Skier_Dude or one of his bots just deleted the image I uploaded. The image was the logo of the company that they gave to be uploaded to Creative Commons. Could you please help me get it up in that page? Thank you so much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjunsubburaj (talk • contribs) 12:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Greetings from rainy Brno, Arjunsubburaj :) I'm not sure why your image was deleted, but you can upload the cover (?) of Dinamalar as a non-free media here on Wikipedia (not on Commons). An example is here, and an useful template you can find here: Non-free magazine cover. See also Non-free use rationale guideline. Hope that helps. --Vejvančický (talk) 12:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Opps, it was logo? I have very little experience with uploading of these images. Look at WP:Logos for help. Btw, there are several images related to Dinamalar at Commons. However, I'm not sure if they are really free. --Vejvančický (talk) 12:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks mate, your links helped. Yes the images you found are from Dinamalar's newspaper scans. I have uploaded the image and here it is. If it does get deleted again due to something, I dont even know how to find out why. It would be a good help if you can just keep an eye on this. Thanx a lot.

File:Dinamalar.png Arjunsubburaj (talk) 13:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh, ok, sorry my bad. lol you too...Arjunsubburaj (talk) 14:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Exodus Extranium
Why is my band page up for "Speedy Deletion"? I put up the necessary info! I don't have any singles that have played on the radio. So what. This is gonna be the second time that my page is going to be taken down and I'm sick of having to put in the solid hour to make the page, and all of the sudden have it be deleted. Tell me what I'm supposedly doing wrong. Woody001100 (talk) 1:52, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Woody. I'm sorry for your lost work, I didn't mean to waste your time. However, I explained my deletion nomination yesterday at your talk page:


 * Is this band notable? For further information on Wikipedia requirements for musicians and bands, look at WP:BAND, please.

This is an encyclopedia, not MySpace or Facebook. Wikipedia doesn't have an article for every band in the world. Please, again, read the criteria mentioned in this link. Hope that helps. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Jaromír Weinberger
Hello Vejvančický: I recently updated the list of compositions for Jaromír Weinberger. Many of the (early) works were published by German publishing houses and do not list the original Czech titles. I was wondering if you have any information about the titles? Best regards, Hrdinský (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Vaše práce je velmi oceňována. Mockrát děkuji! Hrdinský (talk) 19:38, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Suresh Fageria
You're probably right that it ultimately can't be kept; the guy probably really isn't notable enough for Wikipedia. But it seems very aggressive (see WP:BITE) to nominate it for deletion only a few minutes after creation. Maybe we could wait 24 hours to see if the editor can bring in sources to support his claim, and if not, nominate it for deletion tomorrow. +Angr 07:51, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your recommendations, Angr. I nominate articles for CSD only when I'm absolutely sure that they are hopeless. The article deals with living person and contains pretty bold - unreferenced - claims. Usually I'm trying to add reliable sources by myself, but I can't find any sources confirming the notability of this subject. CSD and AfD nomination is just a logical step, I didn't mean to be "biting" :) Thanks for your cooperation. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * On second thought, you are right, this was really "speedy". Thank you for reminding me that. --Vejvančický (talk) 10:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Tekeli Lala Mehmed Pasha
Hi Vejvančický! I will add sources for the article this evening (no time for the moment:), although they are scarce given the length of his period of office. You can put an unreferenced tag in the meantime if you want to, but I will develop it soon. Regards. Cretanforever (talk) 12:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again Vejvančický! Regarding Tekeli Lala Mehmed Pasha, I added a source to the article in the Turkish language wikipedia. I will insert here mention of "The imperial harem: Women and sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire, Author: Leslie P. Peirce, Oxford University Press", the section on "The Daye Hatun". Should be sufficient. Regards. Cretanforever (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi again Panie Vejvančický! I included the source in the article as previously stated, but I thought it would be superfluous to provide the link to the cover page. Anyone who is interested should be able to locate it through the ISBN number or Amazon or a similar agent. Regards. Cretanforever (talk) 12:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
CalumH93 (talk) 11:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Alexander Goldscheider and Terezín: The Music 1941-44
Dear Mr. Vejvančický

I left answers to your kind comments re the two above articles on their respective deletion discussions. I can provide you with more details, documents, etc., should you need any. You have access to my Terezin CDs on You can see my other releases there as well. You can also hear the Stabat Mater and The Song of Songs on under my name, should you wish. Finally, you can also write to me either in English or Czech directly on a@goldscheider.net

I really appreciated your comments and I hope I answered them in a helpful manner.

Thank you

AG —Preceding unsigned comment added by AGRR (talk • contribs) 02:15, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Vejvančický once again thanks for your most recent comments and valuable support. I am not very sure where I should continue the discussion re the article concerning myself as well as the one on the subject of Terezín, but I only wish to re-affirm to you that I would be delighted to participate on an article on Terezín. I have a lot of literature on the subject myself, I know quite a few musicologists, historians and authors who are devoted to the topic and there are still Terezín survivors who could comment first-hand. My answer to your question is an unequivocal Yes, but I shall leave all the initiative to yourself as my knowledge of how to tackle anything on Wikipedia is clearly somewhat flawed.

AGRR (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

zoologische mededelingen description
Dear Vejvančický

as i represent national museum of natural history Naturalis, i represent the copyright holder to this text,which we created ourselves. DPC UvA is acting as webpublisher on our behalf. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kees hendriks (talk • contribs) 12:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Hendriks

Please, read the recommendations in the message at your talk page. I don't know if you really represent the copyright holder of this text. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AbdulHamid Adiamoh
A tag has been placed on AbdulHamid Adiamoh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Taqi Haider (talk) 17:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Perhaps you're right, it was probably Business Gambia became a huge success plus the cut-and-paste appearance that triggered my deletion figure, but looking again it should be an easy fix for you. Saved in your sandbox  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks OK, I tweaked a bit. A query - 200,000 Gambian dalasi corresponding to about D9500....a maximum sentence of D250,000 It looks to me as if the 9500 can't be D (dalasi) since hat doesn't make sense. Do you think it could be USD, or should it just go?  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  10:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Altered Speedy Deletion rationale: Harland Mordecai
Hello Vejvančický, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have deleted a page you tagged (Harland Mordecai) under a criterion different from the one your provided, which was inappropriate or incorrect. CSD criteria are narrow and specific to protect the encyclopedia, and the process is more effective if the correct deletion rationale is supplied. Consider reviewing the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! Ged UK  10:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It was just that the article was apparently about a beard someone grew, rather than the actual person. It was just vandalism! Thanks for your tagging work though :) Ged  UK  10:06, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello Ged. Yes, the article described someone who has a beard called 'Harland Mordecai' :) It was close to db-bio and a funny kind of db-vandalism as well. Thanks for letting me know. Best. --Vejvančický (talk) 10:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion...
Greetings Vejvančický - I realise that in a perfect world, and given all the time in the universe to do things right, a speedy deletion template should adjust perfectly to the "crime" committed. But surely it's better to leave the original speedy deletion tag in place and let the corresponding administrator decide whether to delete as per request or divert it accordingly?

Changing the template as you did just ensures that the page is up longer than necessary and takes time away from other useful stuff that can be done. In the case in point, "nonsense" is what was on the page and I tagged it as such. What criteria do you have for supposing Omar Akbar is a real person? Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 10:06, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello Technopat. I re-tagged the article when it contained only the date of birth and unknown date of death. Later I noticed that the page creator added nonsense remark about subject's death in 2011 (?). However, I apply the db-nonsense tag mainly to absolutely incomprehensible articles, as the template contains this text: ...consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This does not include poor writing, vandalism, material not in English, badly translated material, hoaxes, etc. In this case, the db-vandalism would be useful as well. Sorry for the confusion. Have a nice day. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Greetings Vejvančický - thanks for reply. Have fun editing!--Technopat (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK
Thanks for submitting Abdul Hamid Adiamoh to DYK. There are still some issues to be resolved; see T:TDYK. Ucucha 20:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gary Burden
A tag has been placed on Gary Burden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ArcAngel (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Velislavova Bible
I have edited the article for this but do not know what to put as a caption for the page illustrated. (Česky: Stvoření světa - Velislavova bible)--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 11:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the details: have revised the statement.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 23:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Guzzoh
I am guzzoh .. i made a page for myself before sum1 else takes it.. so why u send me messages talking about personal attacks?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GuZZoh (talk • contribs) 08:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't know who you are. This article contains personal informations and defamatory claims related to a living person. Please, do not create similar pages, this is an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note that the page was deleted as a test page. My take of it is that it was created by the person about themself, and wasn't necessarily an attack page. Regardless it didn't belong on Wikipedia and your action to mark for WP:CSD was correct, even if the categorisation was a little off. Cheers, NJA (t/ c)  08:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure, but I think there was a full name of that person in this article. I can't judge perfectly who created it, this is an anonymous online world. If I see a name of a person together with claims like "he hates school" or "he likes to say fuck everything", then it is very close to a personal attack. Sorry for the confusion. Have a nice day. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Fritz Weiss

 * Thanks for your message re the edit, Regards, Ericoides (talk) 16:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Heckel
Dobrý den, nechtěl byste tenhle článek zdokonalit i v češtině? Děkuji, svajcr.--85.207.18.54 (talk) 14:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)he

Czech Christmas Mass
Hello Vejvančický: Thank you for asking me about the Czech Christmas Mass. I didn't know this work and now I must get a recording. I've made some changes – feel free to revert anything you think necessary.

In the opening paragraph "Czech background" needs to be clarified; does "background" mean "setting", "adaptation", "version", "description", ...? Maybe this should be "...the work has a rather pastoral character with weight on the Czech description of the nativity."?

Thanks again! Hrdinský (talk) 17:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The Supraphon recording is also available in an English version (Amazon). It may have a different product number, but I haven't found it as yet. Hrdinský (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the elaboration. I changed the sentence on the page; I think the meaning is more clear. This article is up for DYK on Christmas day?? Hrdinský (talk) 08:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Hostile and disruptive?
What the hell are you blathering on about? 98.248.33.198 (talk) 09:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm talking about this (speedy deletion nomination of an article with clear assertion of notability) and this (tagging similar article one minute after creation). --Vejvančický (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hate to disrupt you cute little fantasy world, but simply stating that somebody is important doesn't make them so. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * This is not "my cute little fantasy world", rather a habit to think before acting, and treat people friendly. Please, read the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging more articles. --Vejvančický (talk) 10:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Shiv Visvanathan
Nice work with the page, I was going to find references for it but it seems like you beat me to it. -Regancy42 (talk) 10:06, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello Regancy42. I'm still not sure if this person is notable (per WP:PROF), but it surely isn't a speedy candidate. --Vejvančický (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Notifying the author for speedy deletion
Thanks for telling me about notifying people when you nominate the article for deletion, I shall do that in future :) --HappyBirthday2U 15:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happy Birthday To You! (talk • contribs)

About my page
Why did you delete my page about Meta Knight? I know the old page was deleted but it was without reason. That article that I made was unfinished and I was going to finish it today. Mr. Anon515 (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The page was not deleted, it was just redirected to the List of characters in the Kirby series according to consensus. If you want to recreate the stand alone article, please, look at previous discussions at Talk:Meta Knight and Talk:List_of_characters_in_the_Kirby_series for better information. You can also ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. I've also noted the sourcing of your article:


 * I recommend you to find sources independent on Wikipedia, as Wikipedia cannot be used as a source for itself. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There are some problems to this:


 * 1) I have left a message on the talk page, but I haven't gotten a reply
 * 2) It says that disscusion of the page's merge should be disscused on the page it was redirected to. However, on that page, it says disscusion should be placed on the talk page of the meta knight article.
 * 3) On the talk page, very few people agreed with the merge/redirect and most wanted to undo it.
 * 4) I'm not very good at citing sources, as said on my user page. I can only make ones like on the reflist.
 * In all, I think it should be ressurected. Mr. Anon515 (talk) 01:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I presented your request at the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Please, follow the discussion here. Thanks.--Vejvančický (talk) 10:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Mamora
You had previously nominated Daniel Mamora for deletion due to sourcing and non-verifiability. I've speedied it because a cursory examination shows it to be a complete hoax. According to his own statement, he's a K-12 student claiming to have worked on The Price Is Right and currently at KBIG-FM; there's no record of either. Which template do I use to notify the user that I've speedied it? Thanks! JTRH (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello JTRH, thank you. You can find the preloaded notification at the bottom of the speedy deletion template: Daniel Mamora ~ . Btw, I think is more appropriate in this case. Have a nice day. --Vejvančický (talk) 14:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. JTRH (talk) 14:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)