User:VenIl9696

- Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The concept of the triune Russian people in the reflection of the results of census 1897. Presents "Russian general", and their three components: the Great Russians, the Little Russians, Belarusians. Triune Russian people (also common Russian people, one Russian people, the one Russian nation, the great Russian people, etc.) - the concept, assuming representation of the Russian people as a unified community of the Great Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians. Is the official state-concept of the Russian Empire. [1]

Appearance
The emergence of a new state ideology in the Russian state is associated with the accession of territories left-bank Ukraine to the Moscow State during the second half of the XVII century. [2] Ukrainian PhD S. Sinyakov writes that the idea of ​​unification of Ukraine and Russia "was not imposed by the government of Moscow, and was originally the Ukrainian," and she came from a part of the Cossack, and its mainstreaming in this medium will be denoted by the end of the XVI century and was fixed all XVII century. [2] In compiling the second half of XVII century Kiev synopsis, is credited with the authorship of which Archimandrite of Kiev-Pechersk Lavra Innocent Gisela were presented theses on the ancient unity of the "Russian people", considered the foundation of modern Ukrainian science concept of an old nation. [3] At the same time, "Synopsis" is a kind of spiritual constitution of the updated state. [2] The first author of the thesis of the triune Russian nation is considered to be the rector of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Bishop and Archbishop of Novgorod, Pskov, a professor of Theophanes Prokopovich. [2] Prokopovich said about such people and to his autocrat Great, Small and White Russia. [2] Constituent concept == == Russian historian Andrei Marchukov writes that the triune Russian people are ethnic center of the Russian Empire and was at its highest level of ethnic hierarchy. [4] In this Marchukov believes that this hierarchy is not appropriate to provide a ladder, and in the form of spherical circles radiating from the triune Russian people as a cultural and ethnic core [4]. Typically, in an environment of pre-revolutionary historians to refer to the three components of an all-Russian people use the term "branch", "branch", sometimes - "tribe". [5] Historian Vasily Klyuchevsky assumed that there was a specific period "gap nationality." He wrote that the Russian people, was born in the Kievan Rus', after the steam out "cut in half", and later there was a third "branch" - Belarus. [6] Thus, according to the historian, was born in the era of the Old Russian "Russian" people of the modern period to Kliuchevskoi spawned three "branches", "all-Russian" of the people. [5] Historian Nikolai Kostomarov also shared paradigm of "one of the Russian nationality," and acknowledged the existence of a "specific-Veche era" of the Russian people as a single large ethnic whole, and within it he singled out from three to six nationalities: South Russian, Belarussian, Siverskaya, Pskov, and Great Novgorod. In this Kostomarov tolerance of domestic ethnographic identity of individual parts of the nation. [7]

In the Soviet period
According to observations by researchers in the Soviet historical science, beginning with the second half of the 1930s. there is a certain revival of the concept of pre-revolutionary Russian history, with equalization of the concepts of "Russian" and "East Slavic" people, recognition of the right to existence from the time of Kievan Rus and the more ancient times. Parallel to this, formed the concept of "Old Russian nationality." Its main difference from the previous concept was that under the old Russian (or Russian) people (or peoples) is understood independent ethnic community - the common ancestor of the future of East Slavic peoples, not the initial (or one of the intermediate) stage of development of the "triune Russian people") " [8]. Obvious signs of pre-revolutionary concept of the trinity of the Russian people are traced by modern researchers in the views of the Russian and Soviet historian, academician of the USSR Nikolai Derzhavin. In 1944 he published a monograph "The Origin of the Russian people - the Great, Ukrainian and Belarusian." The whole question of ethnogenesis of the Eastern Slavs among the leading Soviet historians of the pre-war period, was considered as a matter of ethnogenesis "great Russian people". [9] After the war, the Soviet Union formed ideologically more appropriate objectives of the Soviet concept of a single state of the Soviet people as a community of citizens of the Soviet state. In 1961, speaking at the XXII Congress of the CPSU, Nikita Khrushchev declared: "In the USSR there is a new historical community of people of different nationalities, having common characteristics - the Soviet people." Resolution of the XXIV Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet people in 1971 was declared the result of strong socio-political and ideological unity of all classes and strata, nations and nationalities inhabiting the territory of the USSR. Their common language - the language of the Soviet people - has been recognized Russian, which was an expression of "the role played by the Russian people in the fraternal family of peoples of the USSR." In modern times == ==

With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the formation of its main core of the independent states of the Russian Federation, Ukraine and Belorusssii concept of a single Russian or Soviet people lost their ideological basis and state-value, but in the sovereign states have developed theories that deny the trinity of the Russian people. In modern time, the concept of the triune Russian people in various forms is present in political and journalistic environment of Russia [10] Ukraine [11] Belarus [12]. Among the Russian Orthodox Church, as well as in the community of the Russian world, often uses the term "reunification" of the triune Russian people, which is considered the main challenge for the XXI century. [13] In this case, the concept of the trinity is recognized category of the last century, and that required new identities for a new unifying impulse [14].