User:Veronicailijevski/sandbox

1. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Upon reviewing the article, it is clear that all of the current information is relevant regards to Denny Lambert's life. The work outlines the sport he played (hockey), the position, the teams he's play for, the successes he's achieved during as well as following his NHL career. The article also includes his stats over the course of his career based on the various team he's played for as well as the level that he achieved those statistics at. Currently, their is no information that would leave me confused or distracted in regards to this topic. It is well laid out, easy to read and well organized.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

Currently, I was not able to identify any biases in the article. The current information presented is neutral in nature and it seems as though the writer has stuck to the facts and he or she has omitted any source of personal bias towards the subject matter.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

I think that the short comings of this article have to do with the lack of information in regards to him being an individual of First Nations heritage. I think that it is important for that information to be shared because it is something to be proud of. It also represents the nature of his success in my opinion more appropriately. Lastly, I think that information regarding his current career and current successes are important to include to give the reader a better picture of where he was, where he is now and where he is going.

Veronicailijevski (talk) 18:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)