User:VeronikaRoberts33/Sarah Tyson Rorer/Bwaller2x Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

VeronikaRoberts33


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VeronikaRoberts33/Sarah_Tyson_Rorer?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sarah Tyson Rorer

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Lead has not been updated to reflect the new content added. Current lead does well introducing the article while being concise and not overly detailed.

Content

New content is relevant to the article. The information that was added is up-to-date. New content seems to be a summarized version of what is already in the article, not sure if there is additional benefit to adding the new content.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the added content is neutral and without bias.

Sources and References

Information is backed by a reliable source and formatted correctly. Content does reflect what is provided by the source

Organization

New content is well written, concise, and easy to read. Unclear as to where the new content is being placed.

Images and MediaNo media was added to the article.