User:VeronikaRoberts33/Sarah Tyson Rorer/Rejoro323 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

VeronikaRoberts33


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VeronikaRoberts33/Sarah_Tyson_Rorer?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sarah Tyson Rorer

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Added content: "Sarah Tyson Rorer was a newspaper columnist for magazines like Table Talk Magazine, Household New, Ladies Home Journal, and Good House Keeping. "

The content added is neutral, unbiased, and relevant to Sarah Tyson's life. There is no persuasion in the added sentence. A possible revision of the sentence can be instead of saying "like", the sentence can say "such as". The fact presented in the sentence was found from a Pennsylvania website that promotes libraries and books. The website holds articles, bibliographies, and other materials. After looking through the website, it seems to give reliable and credible information to readers.

The content adds to the flow and information of the article. The content overall improves and creates a more complete article. The citation of the content is correct. I am unsure where the content belongs, however. It would be helpful to insert the sentence in the correct spot in the sandbox for easier analysis.