User:Veroonikka99/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Barghawata :(Barghawata)
 * This is the article hat has been assigned to me

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes the lead sentence introduces the Barghawatas and states who they were
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes the lead introduces the topic of geography and history in relation to the Barghawatas
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no it does not
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? the lead is concise and gives a quick overview which is further discussed in detail in the article

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes the content gives history and a background story of the tribe
 * Is the content up-to-date? yes the most recent edit on the article was august 9th 2019
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? not much information present on the kings.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? no
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? not enough sources used for the history section of the article.
 * Are the sources current? No they are over 10 years old
 * Check a few links. Do they work? 3 f them do not work and most of them are links to other wikipedia articles.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes it is clear
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? only one image but it relates to the topic
 * Are images well-captioned?yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? no

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? wikipedia goes very into detail

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? its okay but could use work
 * What are the article's strengths? easy to read and follow
 * How can the article be improved? more sources
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? underdeveloped

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: