User:Vertebrates.for.Invertebrates/Chromodoris annae/Mer0814 Peer Review

General info
Vertebrates.for.Invertebrates
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Vertebrates.for.Invertebrates/Chromodoris annae
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chromodoris annae

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:


 * It would probably be beneficial for your page to have a more detailed introduction with some more general information about the species or its family.

Content:


 * The distribution section
 * This section could use some more information
 * The information there is descriptive and detailed.
 * The behavior and ecology section
 * sounds well informed and has some good descriptive information about their behavior one-on-one. The Ecology paragraph might be improved with some more information, perhaps on their predators if there are any.
 * There could be more information added about their behaviors while feeding or hunting, for example how they use their toxin to ward off predators.
 * The reproduction section
 * This section isn't super easy to read, maybe switching around the structure of sentences might help.
 * An brief explanation of what planar spawning species could beneficial here, or a link if there is a wikipedia article on it.
 * It's a bit unclear what you mean by " These eggs are somewhat translucent, but this nudibranch has eggs that have a hue of a cream color, consisting of approximately 3-4 whorls".
 * This section could be improved by adding more diverse set of citations

Tone and Balance:


 * The content added is neutral and does not seem to be biased in anyway.

Citations and references:


 * All information added has a citation.
 * The citations are mostly up-to-date and accessible
 * citation 6 is inaccessible.
 * Citation two does not seem to necessarily be centered around the depth preferences of the species, a reference more centered around it behavior or ecology might give a small range of depth.
 * Overall though this is an interesting source, and could be discussed in a phylogeny or evolution section!
 * Citation three
 * I could be wrong, but this source seems to be only an abstract and does not have to do with Chromodoris annae. the link I follow from the references section did not lead to a full article.
 * Citation 4
 * I'm not sure that this is a peer-reviewed source.
 * Citation 6
 * A good source for reproduction

Organization:


 * The content is generally well-written and easy to read but there are places that could use improvement.
 * Content is well organized but could be diversified a little bit, some of it is pretty specific.