User:Vferreiraa12/Blue jellyfish/Emily.irvin Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Vferreiraa12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Blue jellyfish


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I thought the article was well put together so far. For the lead, there needs to be a bit more information in terms of adding an indtroductory sentence or two that describes what the article's topic is and what it covers, as well as its major sections. I thought the content was relevant and seemed to be up-to-date, with no issue of tone or guidance. Overall I thought the article was a really good starting point, and just needs more information added as you go along.